I’m not beating up on the late professor, one of the best teachers I ever had. In his place, I’d have given the same advice. The limitations of 1960s technology made it difficult to think otherwise. Footnote 4.11: E-mail from Bruce Siceloff. Footnote 4.12: Katherine Fulton, “Heirs to newspaper make unlikely pioneers. So why is Frank Daniels III out on the frontier?”, _Poynter Special Report: Converging Technologies_, 1994, pages 5-7. Footnote 4.13: Ibid. Footnote 4.14: Daniels, in _T Leaves_. Footnote 4.15: The speculation about _Time_’s role in the cable trade is my own. Jim Kinsella, one of the organizers of Pathfinder, told me that he liked this approach but was not necessarily speaking for the company. Footnote 4.16: In Raleigh, a locally oriented arm of Time Warner might enjoy a big advantage over the _N & O_ someday if the newspaper lacked access to cable for Internet purposes. Cable will probably be much better than phone connections, the kind the _N & O_ uses. The best cure, of course, would be laws that (1) assured the _N & O_ a place on local cable and (2) also let the phone companies there go into the cable business. Then the _N & O_ could choose between Time Warner and its phone company allies of the present. Perhaps such laws will be on the books by the time you’re reading this. Meanwhile, I’ll hardly blame the people at Time Warner for unofficially talking up cable for the Internet; as noted before, I’d do the same, given the technical benefits. Footnote 4.17: Conspiracy theorists may take note that another arm of the Newhouse interests, Ballantine Books, is distributing _NetWorld!_ for Prima Publishing. Footnote 4.18: Laurie Flynn, “Getting on-line—the Microsoft way,” _New York Times_, November 20, 1994, page F10. Footnote 4.19: The Stahlman and Smith quotes are from “Time Inc. raises its multimedia profile with an Internet test,” by Deirdre Carmody, _New York Times_, October 24, 1994, page D10. Footnote 4.20: Laura Fillmore, “Online publishing: Threat or menace,” speech to the Online Publishing Conference, Graphic Communications Association, March 1993. Footnote 4.21: Ibid. Footnote 4.22: Ibid. Footnote 4.23: Fillmore, “Slaves of a new machine: Exploring the for-free/for-pay conundrum,” Fifth Conference on Organizational Computing, Coordination, and Collaboration: “Making Money on the Internet,” Austin, Texas, May 10, 1994. Footnote 4.24: Ibid. Footnote 4.25: Vannevar Bush, “As we may think,” _The Atlantic Monthly_, July 1945. Footnote 4.26: Interview with Fillmore. Footnote 4.27: Fillmore, “Slaves.” Footnote 4.28: Ibid. Footnote 4.29: Ibid. Footnote 4.30: Ibid. Footnote 4.31: Rory J. O’Connor, “News firms plan on-line network,” _San Jose Mercury News_, April 20,1995, page 1F. Footnote 4.32: