NetWorld! What People Are Really Doing on the Internet and What It Means to YouRothman, David H.
General
NetWorld! What People Are Really Doing on the Internet and What It Means to You
Rothman, David H.
Internet
The example of messages violating local standards comes from a
syndicated column by Lawrence Magid that appeared in the _Washington
Post_ on March 13, 1995.
Footnote 6.10:
Buckley and George Will are the most famous conservative journalists
in the United States. Among other accomplishments, Buckley is founder
of the _National Review_. His comments appeared in an “On the Right”
column released through the United Press Syndicate on February 24,
1995.
Footnote 6.11:
Perhaps the idea will have been changed by now to allow more freedom
to librarians and the public.
Footnote 6.12:
David Buerger, “Our lives are quickly becoming an open book,”
_Communications Week_, May 9, 1994, page 52.
Footnote 6.13:
Simson Garfinkel, _PGP: Pretty Good Privacy_ (Sebastopol, California:
O’Reilly & Associates, 1995), page 88.
Footnote 6.14:
Ibid.
Footnote 6.15:
Ibid.
Footnote 6.16:
William M. Bulkeley, “Cipher probe: Popularity overseas of encryption
code has the U.S. worried; Grand jury ponders if creator ‘exported the
program through the Internet’; ‘Genie is out of the bottle,’” The
_Wall Street Journal_, April 28, 1994, page A1.
Footnote 6.17:
“Tidbits on the PGP/Zimmermann case—Protecting Americans’ privacy,” an
item that Jim Warren released in the March 6, 1995, issue of his
online newsletter, _Government Access_.
Footnote 6.18:
Steven Levy, “Crypto rebel,” _Wired_, February 1993.
Footnote 6.19:
Ibid.
Footnote 6.20:
Garfinkel, _PGP_, page 112.
Footnote 6.21:
Ibid.
Footnote 6.22:
Ibid.
Footnote 6.23:
As of this writing, it looked as if Warren wouldn’t testify—perhaps
because his remarks would have been so helpful to Zimmermann’s side.
Footnote 6.24:
To its credit, the White House at least called attention to the First
Amendment nightmares of the Exon “decency” bill. Given how bad the
bill was, however, that was a little like denouncing slavery.
Footnote 6.25:
If the case is still on, contact Hugh Miller at hmiller@luc.edu for
information on making donations.
Footnote 6.26:
“Another chop at the Clipper chip,” _Business Week_, February 13,
1995.
Footnote 6.27:
“I oppose the Clipper Chip and all forms of key escrow because it’s
impossible to use bad legislation as a substitute for bad
engineering,” Bob Steele told me. Yes, he’s the same CIA alum as in
chapter 4, the one with whom I agreed in a friendly way to disagree.
Hi, Bob—you’re right on about Clipper!
Footnote 6.28:
Peter Lewis, “Attention shoppers: Internet is open,” the _New York
Times_, August 12, 1994, page D1.
Footnote 6.29:
Bulkeley.
Footnote 6.30:
Ibid.
Footnote 6.31:
Ibid.
Footnote 6.32:
Privacy International is an international human rights organization
founded in 1987 to oppose privacy invasions worldwide. It led the
campaign to fight a national card proposal in Australia that ended up
causing Parliament to dissolve in 1987.
Footnote 6.33:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account