NetWorld! What People Are Really Doing on the Internet and What It Means to YouRothman, David H.
General
NetWorld! What People Are Really Doing on the Internet and What It Means to You
Rothman, David H.
Internet
The most cautious contributors were MCI’s lawyers, or whoever else had
written the legalese for one Web site. All writers and artists had to
send in releases saying they wouldn’t sue MCI for using accidentally
similar material. The lawyers warned, “All work that is submitted
electronically over the Internet needs to be accompanied by a hard copy
of the release form, sent in separately by postal mail. We will not look
at any work placed on our server until we have received the hard copy of
the release form. All files on the server older than 14 days, for which
we have not received a release, will not be reviewed....” I remembered
the essay on theology. It was uninspired enough for an attorney other
than Scott Turow to have written it, and sure enough, the author’s note
said he was “happy with the practice of law.”
Despite the less-than-striking short stories and the soporific essay, I
loved the sparkle of Gramercy Press as a whole. I recalled an area on
the Web known as Bianca’s Smut Shack. Its creators let you get inside
the head of a virtual woman, let you know what books she read, what
movies she watched, what records she listened to, and you could add your
own opinions. At the time I’d told the Shack crew, “Watch out, folks.
Don’t be surprised if a big company creates characters in an ad where
_everyone_ buys the right products.” Well, it had happened. And MCI and
its advertising agency had done many good things that people with their
resources could more easily accomplish.
Building Notre Dame, thousands of workers had pieced together the stone,
fashioned the gargoyles, assembled the stained-glass windows. And the
MCI Web area, while hardly art, was somewhat like a cathedral. The
area’s masterminds had bungled in some ways, but they had used sheer
staff power to toil over countless details.
I was sorry when Mark Pettit told me that some Real People in Publishing
had hated Gramercy Press. Didn’t they get it? Granted, the publishing
company was stereotypical to the point of being self-satirizing. But so
what? I was no more expecting MCI to be a first-rate publisher than I
was expecting Random House to lay fiber-optic cable.
As a display of the Web’s potential to attract a mass audience, of
course, the Gramercy endeavor had triumphed. For consumer business on
the Net to take off, ads would have to be a complete departure from
those on television, and MCI had done just that—even if it was able to
benefit from characters from the older medium. Many small-timers could
never have discovered an actress as perfectly suited to play Darlene as
Katy Selverstone was. This was a real coup. MCI was brilliantly drawing
in a big crowd through a skillful interplay of television, print, and
the Net.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account