NetWorld! What People Are Really Doing on the Internet and What It Means to YouRothman, David H.
General
NetWorld! What People Are Really Doing on the Internet and What It Means to You
Rothman, David H.
Internet
You can’t update the ink on pulped trees the way you can move around
dots on a computer screen. “Aren’t newspapers obsolete?” scads of
techies are asking. Besides, the Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill area has
changed. Thousands of locals swap e-mail addresses at cocktail parties,
while many schoolchildren grow up reading off computer screens as well
as from books. IBM and other Fortune 500 companies are in Research
Triangle Park outside town.
Still, like the Raleigh area, the _N & O_ has evolved. In a nearby
building, a small crew is putting out electronic newspapers on the
Internet and on a bulletin board system. This isn’t just a
pulp-and-ink-era newspaper company. It’s also an Internet provider.
Aided by two phone companies, the _N & O_ gives out free Internet
service to teachers and students to find out what the latter would like
online in the future. It’s offered Netfolks a colorful, multimedia tour
of the state. Tens of thousands drop by the _N & O_ area each week. “The
Internet is like the real world—unorganized, unruly, and filled with
more happenings than any one person can possibly track,” says Frank
Daniels III, the paper’s executive editor. “It’s growing at a fantastic
speed, and its citizens are literate. An opportunity for editors!”[4.2]
Not everyone on the print side feels as he does. When a _Washington
Post_ writer did a gossipy little item on Cliff Stoll’s net.exposé, the
journalist said book editors were looking forward to reviewing _Silicon
Snake Oil_ as “confirmation of what they hoped was true all along.”[4.3]
That may or may not have been a joke. Whatever the case, a war is going
on between pulped wood and electrons. Can commercial publications, from
newspapers to book publishers, learn to love the Internet, and what does
this mean to us readers?
“There is no doubt in my mind that the Net will force a transformation
of newspapers,” says Peter Lewis, a cyberspace writer for the _New York
Times_, “but demise? That’s what they said about radio and television as
well.”[4.4] Just the same, a headline in _Wired_ magazine said online
newspapers “still suck.” Many newspapers are too enamored with the
traditional models where editors and writers inflict whatever they want
on the unsuspecting public. They don’t give their readers enough of a
chance to speak back online or communicate with each other. Still, the
best electronic publications can indeed be two way. And more and more of
them will be packaged for the medium. You’ll be able to read summaries
of stories, for example, and then summon up longer versions with a click
of the mouse.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account