Neurosyphilis : $b Modern systematic diagnosis and treatment presented in one hundred and thirty-seven case historiesSouthard, Elmer Ernest
Science
Neurosyphilis : $b Modern systematic diagnosis and treatment presented in one hundred and thirty-seven case histories
Southard, Elmer Ernest
Neurosyphilis
The patient claimed syphilitic infection seven years before, namely, at
24 years of age, and also claimed that he had infected his wife, who was
in fact at the time undergoing antisyphilitic treatment. He complained
of insomnia, worry, depression, hypersensitivity to noises (such as
those made by his own children), thoughts of suicide, and amnesia. The
amnesia, however, might be regarded as subjective since our tests failed
to show amnesia. Nor was there any diminution in arithmetical ability.
Despite the patient’s claim that he had been “way off in his way of
thinking,” there appeared to be no delusions. Beyond a certain
flightiness in conversation, we could hardly get any evidence of
psychosis unless of the neurasthenic order.
=Physically=, however, the left pupil failed to react to light though it
was found to react to distance, and the right pupil exhibited a
diminution of its reaction to light. There was no ataxia of gait, yet
there was a complete Romberg reaction. There was a moderate tremor of
the hands and of the tongue. Otherwise there were no reflex disorders
upon systematic examination, nor was there any demonstrable disorder in
the rest of the physical examination.
1. What is the diagnosis in the case of James Burns? On the whole we
agree with Nonne, that negative spinal fluid findings (of course,
in the absence of treatment) preclude the diagnosis of general
paresis. The symptoms might possibly be explained, however, by
means of a localized syphilitic involvement of the cerebrum, no
cells or products of inflammation having penetrated to the spinal
fluid. According to Head and Fearnsides, this condition may be
found especially in the anterior or middle fossa. Accordingly,
going upon these views of Nonne and of Head and Fearnsides, we
should be entitled to make, perhaps, a diagnosis of cerebral
syphilis.
2. What is the significance of the Argyll-Robertson pupil in James
Burns? Nonne states that if one follows cases with
Argyll-Robertson pupil over a sufficient period of years, they one
and all eventuate in active symptoms of cerebrospinal syphilis
(not necessarily of the cortical type), and this despite the fact
that the pupillary change may have been present a number of years
before any other symptom had developed.
=Neurosyphilis (“DISSEMINATED ENCEPHALITIS”) within seven months of
initial infection. Autopsy.=
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account