Neurosyphilis : $b Modern systematic diagnosis and treatment presented in one hundred and thirty-seven case historiesSouthard, Elmer Ernest
Science
Neurosyphilis : $b Modern systematic diagnosis and treatment presented in one hundred and thirty-seven case histories
Southard, Elmer Ernest
Neurosyphilis
both speech and writing may often greatly improve.
Cotton in New Jersey found, among 127 cases of paresis
diagnosticated by modern methods during seven years, that
remissions occurred in but five, or about 4%, lasting from a half
to three years.
2. Does a remission ever amount to a cure? The classical case quoted
in this connection is one observed by Tuczek. This case developed
a picture of paresis in 1876, at the age of 36; and a remission,
or cessation, of symptoms, occurred in 1878; but in 1883, at 43
years, the patient developed a tabes without any trace of mental
disorder, which tabes gradually advanced. By the middle of 1898,
when the patient was 58, certain symptoms of excitement and
confusion occurred, which led to death with dementia, 22 years
after the beginning of the disease. Nissl pronounced the cortex to
be undoubtedly the characteristic cortex of a paretic. This
observation seems to indicate that a clinical remission tantamount
to a clinical recovery may occur without the death of the
spirochetes engaged. This observation is to be held in mind in
connection with all therapeutic work with neurosyphilis.
Nonne states that during his clinical experience of 19 years he
had followed 10 cases of paresis with apparent recovery; but of
these ten cases, four had to be thrown out by Nonne because the
apparent recoveries turned out to be only long and almost complete
remissions, finally issuing in characteristic dementia. Of the
remaining six cases, perhaps two should hardly be counted as
paretic and Nonne rather preferred to term them cases of
syphilitic dementia in the sense of a non-paretic cerebral
syphilis. At the end, therefore, of his review of observations,
Nonne found himself with four cases of true recovery from paresis.
Spielmeyer holds that there is no theoretical reason why paresis
might not be cured, since all the different changes that have been
described in the disease can be halted, and many of them can be
repaired. In particular, he reminds us that the acute infiltrative
process, the neuroglia reaction, and the phagocytic action of the
large mononuclear cells are distinctly removable processes. (See
discussion below under Section V, for apparent cures and
remissions occasionally secured under treatment.)
=REMISSIONS of identical appearance occur in PARETIC (“general
paresis”) and in DIFFUSE (non-paretic) NEUROSYPHILIS.=
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account