| | | | | | | | ... | ... | ... |0·4848 | 0·7856| 9·43| | | | | | | | | ... | ... | ... |0·00177| 0·121| 1·452| ---------+--------------+---------+--------+-------+-------+------+ Returning now to page 84, we see that the volume of the sun alone was considered to be 482,169^{12} cubic miles, which corresponds to a diameter of 972,869 miles. Comparing this with the volume 482,167^{12} cubic miles, see page 99, left after all the members of the Solar system have been separated from the original nebula, we find that there is a remainder of 2,000,000,000,000 cubic miles _less_ than we ought to have. But it will be remembered that we added only 1/700th part to the mass of the sun for the mass of the whole Solar system, whereas it will be seen, by referring to Table II., that we ought to have added 1/696·86th part. Had we done so the sphere containing the whole Solar system at the density of water would have been 973,361·31 miles in diameter with volume of 482,860,744^{9} cubic miles, which would have added 3,153,681,000,000 cubic miles to the volume we started with, and would have left us with 1,375,903,430,000 cubic miles _more_ than we ought to have had. Besides, for the sake of round numbers, we made the diameter of the nebula containing the whole Solar system, at the density of water, to be 973,360 instead of 973,359·208 miles, and thereby really added more to the original volume than we should have; so that the defects in accuracy at the beginning of our work partially counterbalanced each other, which accounts so far for the difference noted at the end not being much more than half of what it should have been. Taking all this into consideration, and the really insignificant magnitudes of the differences that would result from the corrections that could be made, we have not thought it necessary to reform the whole of our calculations. Besides, the data we have been working upon are not so absolutely exact as to insure us that we should get nearer to the truth by making the revision. The whole error would be much more than obliterated were we to apply 5·67 instead of 5·66 for the mean density of the earth to the debit side of the sun's account. To simply describe arithmetical operations conveys no really satisfactory meaning to the mind; of working them out in full there is no end; and to partially represent them as we have done in these pages, although showing how the results are arrived at, still leaves them so mixed up together that it is difficult to compare them with each other, and to note the sequences from the beginning to the end of the whole operation. For these reasons we have compiled Table III., where the whole of the principal and most important data, and results from them, may be followed out and examined.