| 0.07 | ..
beyond law }| | | |
| | | |
Percentage of}| | | |
distance }| .. | 4.50 | .. | 22.54
within law }| | | |
--------------+-----------+-----------+-------------+-----------------
Our register as specified above will be the following:--
-----------+--------+-------+---------------------+-----------------+
Planet. | Rev. of Planet,|Accel. of revolution,|Density of Planet|
|(in solar days) |(Neptune taken as 1) | |
-----------+----------------+---------------------+-----------------+
Neptune. | 60,180.8600 | 1.0000 | 1.132 |
Uranus. | 30,688.3000 | 1.9577 | 1.302 |
Saturn. | 10,759.2198 | 2.8523 | 0.736 |
Jupiter. | 4,332.5848 | 2.4833 | 1.358 |
Asteroids.| 1,714.1876 | 2.5606 | ... |
Mars. | 686.9796 | 2.4629 | 4.188 |
Earth. | 365.2563 | 1.8808 | 5.660 |
Venus. | 224.7007 | 1.6255 | 4.810 |
Mercury. | 87.9692 | 2.5543 | 6.850 |
-----------+----------------+---------------------+-----------------+
A good deal has been written about planets or other bodies existing
between Mercury and the sun, especially about Vulcan whose existence
seemed to be so certain, that his distance from the sun and period
of revolution were calculated to be about 13,000,000 miles and 20
days respectively. Now, with what we have seen about the rate of
acceleration of planets as their orbits approach the sun, we may
endeavour to form some notion of where any within the orbit of Mercury
may be found. If we take the same rate of acceleration we have found
between Venus and Mercury--that is 2·5543, which may be looked upon
as almost the general rate for all the planets--we find that there
might be a planet revolving round the sun in 34·4436 days; but here we
must stop, because, though we could make no objection to the existence
of a planet with the period of revolution just shown, were we to
take another equal step towards the centre of the nebula, the same
acceleration of rotation would give us a planet, or ring for a planet,
revolving round the sun in 13·4454 days; not much more than one-half
the average of his rotation round his axis at the present day, which
would knock on the head most completely the theory that each planet
was detached from the nebula at the time that it was rotating with the
velocity of the planet's orbit, or we should have to conclude that the
nebula had passed, by a long way, its power to abandon matter through
centrifugal force. No one could suppose that a ring for a planet could
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account