New Witnesses for God (Volume 2 of 3)Roberts, B. H. (Brigham Henry)
Religion
New Witnesses for God (Volume 2 of 3)
Roberts, B. H. (Brigham Henry)
Book of Mormon; Smith, Joseph, Jr., 1805-1844
In addition to this acknowledgement of the visit of Martin Harris to
him with the transcript of the Nephite characters, Professor Anthon
subsequently made another acknowledgement of Martin Harris' visit in
a letter written to Rev. T. W. Coit, in answer to a note of inquiry
from that gentleman concerning the professor's connection with the
Book of Mormon. The letter was published in _The Church Record_, vol.
I, no. 22; and is frequently quoted, in parts, at least, in various
anti--"Mormon" works. _The Church Record_ was published in New York, I
think; but not having access to that volume I am under the necessity
of copying the parts of Anthon's second letter from anti--"Mormon"
books. None of these anti--"Mormon" works publish the letter in full,
and doubtless for the reason that in this second letter Mr. Anthon
contradicts several statements that he makes in his letter to E. D.
Howe. Following is his letter to Rev. Coit:
New York, April 3, 1841.
_Rev. and Dear Sir_: I have often heard that the "Mormons" claimed
me for an auxiliary, but as no one until the present time has
even requested from me a statement in writing, I have not deemed
it worth while to say anything publicly on the subject. What I do
know of the sect relates to some of the early movements; and as the
facts may amuse you, while they will furnish a satisfactory answer
to the charge of my being a "Mormon" proselyte, I proceed to lay
them before you in detail.
Many years ago,--the precise date I do not now recollect,--a
plain-looking countryman called upon me with a letter from Dr.
Samuel L. Mitchell, requesting me to examine, and give my opinion
upon a certain paper, marked with various characters, which the
doctor confessed he could not decipher, and which the bearer of the
note was very anxious to have explained. A very brief examination
of the paper, convinced me that it was a mere hoax, and a very
clumsy one too. The characters were arranged in columns, like the
Chinese mode of writing, and presented the most singular medley
that I ever beheld. Greek, Hebrew and all sorts of letters, more
or less distorted, either through unskilfulness or from actual
design, were intermingled with sundry delineations of half
moons, stars, and other natural objects, and the whole ended in
a rude representation of the Mexican zodiac. The conclusion was
irresistible, that some cunning fellow had prepared the paper
in question for the purpose of imposing upon the countryman who
brought it, and I told the man so without any hesitation. He
then proceeded to give me the history of the whole affair, which
convinced me that he had fallen into the hands of some sharper,
while it left me in great astonishment at his simplicity. On my
telling the bearer of the paper that an attempt had been made to
impose on him and defraud him of his property, he requested me
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account