New Witnesses for God (Volume 2 of 3)Roberts, B. H. (Brigham Henry)
Religion
New Witnesses for God (Volume 2 of 3)
Roberts, B. H. (Brigham Henry)
Book of Mormon; Smith, Joseph, Jr., 1805-1844
The result at which our author arrives upon a long examination into
the different uses of the word "Spirit" is, that these expressions
respecting the infusion of the Spirit "signify nothing more than
that the prophets had a singular and extraordinary virtue and
cultivated piety, with very great constancy of mind, and thereby
they had a perception of the mind or judgment of God; for we shall
find that the Spirit of God denotes in Hebrew as well the mind as
the judgment or sentence of God, and therefore that the law of God,
because it unfolded the mind of God, is called the mind or Spirit
of God; therefore the imagination of the prophets might, with equal
justice, be said to be the mind of God, and the prophets be said
to have had the mind of God, inasmuch as through their imagination
the decrees of God were revealed. * * * The question how the
prophets acquired a sense of certainty respecting their revelations
gives rise to a long discussion. Their imagination being the
main instrument of their discoveries, they cannot have the same
security as we have for those truths which are discovered by
scientific insight or "natural light." "It is," says Spinoza, very
characteristically, "a moral, not a mathematical security. It is
derived (1) from the great strength of their phantasy, which brings
objects before them as clearly as we see them when we are awake.
(2) From some divine sign. (3) From their minds being disposed to
the right and just," Spinoza affirms the last to be the principal
secret of their certainty. * * * Nevertheless, he affirms that the
revelations to the prophet depended upon his temperament and upon
his own opinions. These he brought with him--these varied not only
his style of writing, but his understanding of any communication
that was made to him. His joy, his sorrow, all the different moods
of his mind and body, were continually affecting his judgments and
his teachings. * * * Every thoughtful reader will perceive that
in these statements Spinoza has an evident advantage over those
who treat the personal feelings, experiences, struggles of the
prophets, as if they were nothing--who forget that they were human
beings--who look upon them merely as utterers of certain divine
dogmas, or as foretelling certain future events. He has a right
to say that such persons overlook the letter of the books, while
they profess to honor the letter; that they change their substance,
while they think that they are taking them just as they are. But no
real devout reader of the prophets ever forgets that they are men.
Their human feelings, sufferings, rejoicings, are parts to him of
the divine revelation. The struggles of the prophet with his own
evil--the consciousness and confession that the vile is mixed with
the precious--help more than all formal teaching to show him and us
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account