New worlds for old: A plain account of modern socialismWells, H. G. (Herbert George)
General
New worlds for old: A plain account of modern socialism
Wells, H. G. (Herbert George)
Socialism
"The idea of individual liberty is one that has grown in
importance and grows with every development of modern thought.
To the classical Utopists freedom was relatively trivial.
Clearly they considered virtue and happiness as entirely
separable from liberty, and as being altogether more important
things. But the modern view, with its deepening insistence
upon individuality and upon the significance of its
uniqueness, steadily intensifies the value of freedom, until
at last we begin to see liberty as the very substance of life,
that indeed it is life, and that only the dead things, the
choiceless things live in absolute obedience to law. To have
free play for one's individuality is, in the modern view, the
subjective triumph of existence, as survival in creative work
and offspring is its objective triumph. But for all men, since
man is a social creature, the play of will must fall short of
absolute freedom. Perfect human liberty is possible only to a
despot who is absolutely and universally obeyed. Then to will
would be to command and achieve, and within the limits of
natural law we could at any moment do exactly as it pleased us
to do. All other liberty is a compromise between our own
freedom of will and the wills of those with whom we come in
contact. In an organized state each one of us has a more or
less elaborate code of what he may do to others and to
himself, and what others may do to him. He limits others by
his rights and is limited by the rights of others, and by
considerations affecting the welfare of the community as a
whole.
"Individual liberty in a community is not, as mathematicians
would say, always of the same sign. To ignore this is the
essential fallacy of the cult called Individualism. But in
truth, a general prohibition in a State may increase the sum
of liberty, and a general permission may diminish it. It does
not follow, as these people would have us believe, that a man
is more free where there is least law, and more restricted
where there is most law. A socialism or a communism is not
necessarily a slavery, and there is no freedom under
anarchy....
"It follows, therefore, in a modern Utopia, which finds the
final hope of the world in the evolving interplay of unique
individualities, that the State will have effectually chipped
away just all those spendthrift liberties that waste liberty,
and not one liberty more, and so have attained the maximum
general freedom."...
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account