New worlds for old: A plain account of modern socialismWells, H. G. (Herbert George)
General
New worlds for old: A plain account of modern socialism
Wells, H. G. (Herbert George)
Socialism
As the outcome of certain private experiences, the moral of which was
pointed by discussion with Mr. and Mrs. Webb, the present writer in
1902 put before the Fabian Society a paper on Administrative
Areas,[22] in which he showed clearly that the character and
efficiency and possibilities of a governing body depend almost
entirely upon the suitability to its particular function of the size
and quality of the constituency it represents and the area it
administers. This may be stated with something approaching scientific
confidence. A local governing body for too small an area or elected
upon an unsound franchise _cannot_ be efficient. But obviously before
you can transfer property from private to collective control you must
have something in the way of a governing institution which has a
reasonably good chance of developing into an efficient controlling
body. The leading conception of this Administrative Area paper
appeared subsequently running through a series of tracts, _The New
Heptarchy Series_, in which one finds it applied first to this group
of administrative problems and then to that.[23] These tracts are
remarkable if only because they present the first systematic
recognition on the part of any organized Socialist body of the fact
that a scientific reconstruction of the methods of government
constitutes not simply an incidental but a necessary part of the
complete Socialist scheme, the first recognition of the widening scope
of the Socialist design that makes it again a deliberately
constructive project.[24]
[22] See Appendix to _Mankind in the Making_. (Chapman and
Hall, 1905.)
[23] 1. _Municipalization by Provinces._ 2. _On the Reform
of Municipal Service._ 3. _Public Control of Electric Power
and Transit._ 4. _The Revival of Agriculture: a National
Policy for Great Britain._ 5. _The Abolition of Poor Law
Guardians._ Others to follow. (Fabian Society, 1905-6.)
[24] This generalization is a sweeping one, and would need,
were one attempting to give more than a very broad
impression of the sequence of Socialist ideas, considerable
modification. Such earlier tracts as _The New Reform Bill_,
_Facts for Londoners_, _Facts for Bristol_, dealt mainly
with the question of machinery.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account