New York Times Current History: The European War from the Beginning to March 1915, Vol 1, No. 2: Who Began the War, and Why?Various
History
New York Times Current History: The European War from the Beginning to March 1915, Vol 1, No. 2: Who Began the War, and Why?
Various
World War, 1914-1918
Subsequent information tended to show that the German force has
penetrated still further into Belgian territory. We also received this
morning from the German Ambassador here the telegram sent to him by the
German Foreign Secretary, and communicated by the Ambassador to us. It
is in these terms:
Please dispel any mistrust that may subsist on the part of the
British Government with regard to our intentions by repeating most
positively formal assurance that, even in the case of armed
conflict with Belgium, Germany will, under no pretense whatever,
annex Belgian territory. Sincerity of this declaration is borne out
by fact that we solemnly pledged our word to Holland strictly to
respect her neutrality. It is obvious that we could not profitably
annex Belgic territory without making at the same time territorial
acquisitions at expense of Holland. Please impress upon Sir E. Grey
that German Army could not be exposed to French attack across
Belgium, which was planned according to absolutely unimpeachable
information. Germany had consequently to disregard Belgian
neutrality, it being for her a question of life or death to prevent
French advance.
I have to add this on behalf of his Majesty's Government: We cannot
regard this as in any sense a satisfactory communication. We have, in
reply to it, repeated the request we made last week to the German
Government, that they should give us the same assurance in regard to
Belgian neutrality as was given to us and to Belgium by France last
week. We have asked that a reply to that request and a satisfactory
answer to the telegram of this morning--which I have read to the
House--should be given before midnight.
* * * * *
PENETRATION OF BELGIAN TERRITORY.
Statement by Prime Minister Asquith in House of Commons, Aug. 5.
_Mr. Bonar Law_--May I ask the Prime Minister if he has any information
he can give us today?
_The Prime Minister_--Our Ambassador at Berlin received his passports at
7 o'clock last evening and since 11 o'clock last night a state of war
has existed between Germany and ourselves.
We have received from our Minister at Brussels the following telegram:
I have just received from Minister for Foreign Affairs [that is the
Belgian Minister for Foreign Affairs] a note of which the following
is a literal translation:
"Belgian Government regret to have to inform his
Majesty's Government that this morning armed
forces of Germany penetrated into Belgian
territory in violation of engagements assumed by
treaty.
Belgian Government are further resolved to resist
by all means in their power.
Belgium appeals to Great Britain and France and
Russia to co-operate, as guarantors in defense of
her territory.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account