New York Times Current History: The European War from the Beginning to March 1915, Vol 1, No. 2: Who Began the War, and Why?Various
History
New York Times Current History: The European War from the Beginning to March 1915, Vol 1, No. 2: Who Began the War, and Why?
Various
World War, 1914-1918
In some cases, where recruiting has been slow, men have been
affected by a too exclusive but quite pardonable regard for the
interests of themselves and their families. The provision made from
various sources for the bread winner who has joined the colors or
is at the front might easily be made more generous. But the outlook
for those who are wounded or disabled, or for the families of those
who lose their lives, and perhaps most of all for those who on
their return may find it difficult to secure re-employment, is
thought by many to be insufficiently assured. Private employers and
business firms have, on the whole, met the situation with
liberality; and a similar attitude on the part of the Government
would meet with its immediate reward. It is perhaps a selfish
utterance if a man is heard to say, "How am I going to come out of
it?" or still more, "What good is it going to do to me?"; but if he
put the same question on behalf of those who depend upon him for
subsistence he is entitled to a definite and a not ungenerous
reply.
Two dangers may have to be faced as the war proceeds. One is that
the nation, exhilarated by smaller successes, may think that the
war will soon be over, and that no excessive effort is therefore
required. Traces of this feeling are sometimes visible in the
published letters (how admirable, as a rule, they are!) of soldiers
at the front, telling their families to expect them back in a month
or two's time. The other danger is that, harassed by the
continuance of the struggle, or attracted by delusive offers of
peace or affected by economic or industrial conditions which have
fortunately not so far developed, a section of the nation may cry
out for peace before the victory has been consummated and before
the peril we are fighting to avert is forever destroyed.
It may be that renewed platform activity may be required as time
goes on to sustain the spirit and fortify the constancy of the
nation. In the meanwhile, speakers, from my experience, cannot do
better than dilate upon the immense magnitude of the stakes
involved, and probable long duration of the struggle, and the
supreme importance that our country should, by the strength and
effectiveness of its material contribution to the common cause,
exercise a powerful influence both upon the issue of the struggle
and in the resettlement of territories and forces which will follow
upon its conclusion. I am, Sir, yours obediently,
CURZON OF KEDLESTON.
1 Carlton House Terrace, Sept. 14.
* * * * *
[Illustration: W.L. SPENCER CHURCHILL,
British First Lord of the Admiralty.
(_Photo from Underwood & Underwood._)]
NOW THE WAR HAS COME.
Speech by Winston Spencer Churchill, First Lord of the Admiralty, at
the London Opera House, Sept. 11.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account