New York Times Current History: The European War from the Beginning to March 1915, Vol 1, No. 2: Who Began the War, and Why?Various
History
New York Times Current History: The European War from the Beginning to March 1915, Vol 1, No. 2: Who Began the War, and Why?
Various
World War, 1914-1918
The German note has been a painful surprise to the Belgian
Government. The intentions which the note attributes to France are
in contradiction to the formal declarations which were made to us
on the 1st of August in the name of the republic. Besides, if
contrary to our expectations, France is about to violate the
neutrality of Belgium, Belgium would be prepared to fulfil its
neutrality obligations, and her army would offer to the invader the
most vigorous resistance. The treaties of 1839, confirmed by the
treaties of 1870, commit to the guarantee of the powers and notably
to the Government of his Majesty the King of Prussia the
independence and neutrality of the Kingdom of Belgium.
The Chancellor of the German Empire said in a sitting of the Reichstag
on the 4th of August:
We are in a state of legitimate defense _Necessity knows no law_.
Our troops have occupied Luxemburg and have perhaps already
penetrated into Belgium. This is against the law of nations.
France, it is true, has declared to Brussels that she is determined
to respect the neutrality of Belgium as long as her adversary
respects it, but we know that France was ready to invade Belgium.
France can afford to wait; we cannot. A French attack on our flank
in the region of the lower Rhine might have been fatal. It is for
that reason we have been compelled to ignore the just protests of
the Governments of Luxemburg and Belgium. The _injustice_ which we
thus commit we will _repair_ as soon as our military object has
been attained.
It has been shown how much value can be attached to the assertion of the
alleged intention of France to invade Belgium. That intention, and the
realization of that intention belongs exclusively to Germany and they
must be left in her possession. This is especially the case in view of
the fact that the military dispositions undertaken by France absolutely
refute the allegations of the German Chancellor. So true is this that
when the violation of Belgian territory became an accomplished fact, and
when the King of Belgium appealed under the terms of the treaty of 1839
for support, in maintaining the neutrality of Belgium which these powers
had guaranteed, France was so little prepared to invade Belgium that it
took her more than ten days to get her troops into the country.
The world is familiar with the way Germany has repaired in Belgium the
injustice of which she was guilty, to use the words of the German
Chancellor.
Atrocities in Belgium.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account