New York Times Current History: The European War from the Beginning to March 1915, Vol 1, No. 2: Who Began the War, and Why?Various
History
New York Times Current History: The European War from the Beginning to March 1915, Vol 1, No. 2: Who Began the War, and Why?
Various
World War, 1914-1918
But what is especially wrong is that Grey brought this warning,
which only could have any effect if it remained an absolute,
confidential secret between the English and German Governments, also to
the French Ambassador, so that the entire Entente could mischievously
look on and see whether Germany really would give in to British
pressure. Of course, in his manner of swaying to and fro, he did not
wish either that Cambon should not accept this information to the German
Ambassador as a decided taking of a position on the part of England:
I thought it necessary [speaking to M. Cambon] to say that because
as he knew we were taking all precautions with regard to our fleet
and I was about to warn Prince Lichnowsky not to count on our
standing aside, but it would not be fair that I should let M.
Cambon be misled into supposing that we had decided what to do in a
contingency that I still hoped might not arise....--(British "White
Paper" No. 87.)
Stirring Up Trouble.
On the German side Grey's open threat, which was presented, however,
with smooth and friendly sounding words, was received with quiet
politeness. Goschen telegraphed on the 30th concerning a talk with State
Secretary von Jagow:
His Excellency added that telegram received from Prince Lichnowsky
last night contains matter which he had heard with regret, but not
exactly with surprise, and, at all events, he thoroughly
appreciated the frankness and loyalty with which you had
spoken.--(British "White Paper" No. 98.)
Now the work of stirring up trouble is continued unceasingly. On July 30
the British Ambassador in Paris, Sir F. Bertie, concerning a
conversation with the President of the Republic, reports:
He [Poincare] is convinced that peace between the powers is in the
hands of Great Britain. If his Majesty's Government announced that
England would come to the aid of France in the event of a conflict
between France and Germany ... there would be no war, for Germany
would at once modify her attitude.--(British "White Paper" No. 99.)
Did Grey really think for one moment that the German Empire would
change its position immediately, in other words, would suddenly leave
its ally in need, or is all this only a mass of diplomatic
blandishments?
On the same day Grey steps from the personal warning which he had given
to the German Ambassador to the sharpest official threat. In a telegram
to the Ambassador in Berlin upon the question placed before him by the
Chancellor of the empire on the day prior, (British "White Paper" No.
85,) whether England would remain neutral if Germany would bind itself,
after possible war, to claim no French territory in Europe whatever,
while in lieu of the French colonies a like guarantee could not be
accepted, Grey answers with thundering words:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account