New York Times Current History: The European War from the Beginning to March 1915, Vol 1, No. 2: Who Began the War, and Why?Various
History
New York Times Current History: The European War from the Beginning to March 1915, Vol 1, No. 2: Who Began the War, and Why?
Various
World War, 1914-1918
This mediation [namely, Grey's mediation proposition] had already
been accepted, by Russia on July 25th.
We have shown in the foregoing that the Russian Government did in no
manner subscribe to the conference plan in binding terms. As an
additional proof, a part of Buchanan's dispatch of the 25th may be
mentioned:
He [Sazonof] would like to see the question placed on international
footing.... If Servia should appeal to the powers, Russia would be
quite ready to stand aside and leave the question in the hands of
England, France, Germany, and Italy. It would be possible in his
opinion that Servia might propose to submit the question to
arbitration.--(British "White Paper" No. 17.)
Hence, not if England, but only if Servia would propose arbitration by
the powers, Mr. Sazonof was willing! The most amusing part of this is
that the Russian Minister himself considers such a proposition on the
part of Servia merely as "possible"; evidently it would have appeared as
a great condescension on the part of the Government at Belgrade if it,
standing on the same basis as Austria-Hungary, would appear before a
European tribunal! For us there is no additional proof necessary that a
mediation conference, which for Austria was not acceptable even when
proposed by England, would be unthinkable if the move for such came from
Servia. In expressing such an idea. Mr. Sazonof proved that it was his
intention to bring war about.
[04] The book, which appeared at Oxford, "Why We Are at War," mentioned
previously states on Page 27 (retranslation):
That such a plan [the marching through Luxemburg and Belgium] had
been taken into consideration by the Germans has been known in
England generally for several years; and it has also been generally
accepted that the attempt to carry out this plan would bring about
the active resistance of the British armed forces: one assumed that
these would be given the task of assisting the left wing of the
French, which would have to resist German advance from Belgian
territory.
* * * * *
"Truth About Germany"
* * * * *
Attested by Thirty-four German Dignitaries.[05]
Board of Editors.
Paul Dehn, Schriftsteller, Berlin.
Dr. Drechsler, Direktor des Amerika-Instituts, Berlin.
Matthias Erzberger, Mitglied des Reichstags, Berlin.
Prof. Dr. Francke, Berlin.
B. Huldermann, Direktor der Hamburg-Amerika Linie, Hamburg.
Dr. Ernst Jaeckh, Berlin.
D. Naumann, Mitglied des Reichstags, Berlin.
Graf von Oppersdorff, Mitglied des preussischen Herrenhauses,
Mitglied des Reichstags, Berlin.
Graf zu Reventlow, Schriftsteller, Charlottenburg.
Dr. Paul Rohrbach, Dozent an der Handelshochschule, Berlin.
Dr. Schacht, Direktor der Dresdner Bank, Berlin.
Honorary Committee.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account