New York Times Current History: The European War from the Beginning to March 1915, Vol 1, No. 2: Who Began the War, and Why?Various
History
New York Times Current History: The European War from the Beginning to March 1915, Vol 1, No. 2: Who Began the War, and Why?
Various
World War, 1914-1918
July 27--The Fourteenth Army Corps breaks off its manoeuvres.
July 31--General mobilization.
Aug. 2--French troops attack German frontier posts, cross the
frontier, and occupy German towns. Bomb-throwing aviators come into
Baden and Bavaria; also, after violating Belgium's neutrality by
crossing Belgian territory, they enter the Rhine Province and try
to destroy bridges.
Only after all this is the German Ambassador at Paris instructed to
demand his passports.
And England?
In London war must already have been decided upon by July 31; the
English Admiralty had even before that date advised Lloyd's against
insuring German ships. On the same day the German Government gave
emphatic support in Vienna to the English mediatory proposal of Sir
Edward Grey. But the entire English fleet had already been assembled.
Of course, English public opinion was and still is divided. As late as
Aug. 1 The Daily Graphic wrote in reference to the Russian mobilization
order: "Will the Russian order also be carried out in the provinces on
the German frontier? If so, then the labor of the peace-preservers is at
an end, for Germany is compelled to answer with the mobilization of its
armed forces. We confess that we are not able to understand this
attitude of Russia, in view of the resumption of negotiations at
Vienna."
And a leaflet distributed in the streets of London said that "a war for
Russia is a war against civilization."
So much as to the preparations for the war--and now we take up the
conduct of the war itself.
By glancing at the foreign press during this one week we have been able
to collect the following specimen pieces of news:
London--The British Admiralty reports that the English fleet had
driven back the German fleet to the Dutch coast.
There is not one word of truth in this. The Admiralty itself appears
later to have recovered its senses; at least, it denied a Reuter story
about a "great English naval victory near the Dogger Bank." But the
English manufactories of lies are already so actively at work that
members of Parliament have protested in the House itself against the
"lying reports of the English press."
Paris--From Paris the assertion was made and disseminated
throughout the world that "the landing of English troops in Belgium
has begun; they were enthusiastically received by the population.
The landing proceeded rapidly and in the best order, as the
agreement between the two General Staffs guaranteed the perfect
carrying out of the disembarkment plans."
Not a single word of this is true. At present not one English soldier
has been landed.
In a similar way the Baltic Sea has become the scene of invented
"battles"--of "German defeats," of course; the Russian Baltic Fleet sank
a German war vessel in a battle that never occurred.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account