New York Times Current History; The European War, Vol 2, No. 5, August, 1915Various
History
New York Times Current History; The European War, Vol 2, No. 5, August, 1915
Various
World War, 1914-1918
We can afford to follow events with growing solicitude and
remain neutral as long as we may. Whether or not we maintain
this neutrality to the end our action can change neither the
fortunes of Greece nor the position of other Powers. It is
to be presumed that the power driving this giant conflict to
the conclusion has more remote motives and that to all
appearance, the war will end without any of the participants
suffering a crushing defeat.
While Russian aspirations are generally considered to be in harmony
with those of the Balkan kingdoms, the following extracts from Russian
papers representing varying shades of Muscovite opinion show now an
unfavorable or critical attitude. Thus the foremost organ of the
Panslavist Party, the Russian weekly Slavianski Izvestija, April No.
8, disapproved the Bulgarian plea to give Thrace and Adrianople
through Russian influence. Of the Macedonian question this paper
said:
Bulgarians expect that Russia will get for them Macedonia
Thrace, and Dobrudja, to reward their honest labors. Alas,
they must learn that not every day, but every hour,
Macedonia is receding from their grasp. For Russia the
Macedonian question hardly exists. If Macedonia finds it
hard to be under heroic and benevolent Serbia, what would
become of her on the day when she should fall into the hands
of Bulgaria? And should we Russians, in order to assure
Macedonia such a future, grieve now our dear ally Serbia?
The semi-official Novoye Vremya of Petrograd commented on May 27, on
the statement of the Bulgarian Premier Radoslavoff published in
Vienna, that Bulgaria cannot engage to intervene without a formal
treaty, a policy, it believes, that says but one thing, namely: "You
Russians tricked us Bulgarians once; you shall not trick us again."
This attitude of Bulgaria shows, the Novoye Vremya thinks, "how
thick-headed and insensate its people are." The Birjevaja Viedomosti,
a standpat Russian daily of Petrograd, on May 23 warned Serbia that,
whereas the war began in her behalf and on her account rivers of blood
are flowing, her complaints of the allotment of Dalmatia to Italy
should not "assert principles which have nothing to do with
actualities." The same newspaper says of the whole Balkan situation:
The German policy of von Buelow, having failed in Rome, is
courting failure in Bucharest. In fact, all the German
promises to Rumania seem to go no further than sharpening
the Rumanian appetite for Russian Bessarabia, while holding
out as a last bait the cession of a small parcel of
Bukowina--supposing the Hungarians never consent to yielding
Transylvania to Rumania.
On the other hand, Germany promises Bulgaria the Turkish
province of Thrace and Serbian and Greek Macedonia; but
these compensations have as much value as the cessions of
Corsica and Nice and Tunis in the early days of the war.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account