New York Times Current History; The European War, Vol 2, No. 5, August, 1915Various
History
New York Times Current History; The European War, Vol 2, No. 5, August, 1915
Various
World War, 1914-1918
Since June 15, 1915, the British army, reinforced by
divisions of the "new" army now in France, has held
practically the same position on the front to the north and
south of Ypres. The subjoined report by Sir John French,
Commanding-in-Chief the British forces in France, published
July 12, covers the operations from April 5 down to June 15,
and deals particularly with the great poison-gas attacks by
the enemy, the capture and loss of Hill 60, the second
battle of Ypres, and the battle of Festubert. It embodies
the story by Sir Herbert Plumer of the terrible fighting
that began May 5. France's official reports, following, tell
of the battle of Hilgenfirst in the Vosges, the week's
battle in the Fecht valley, the 120 days' struggle between
Betlaine and Arras, and the battle of Fontenelle. The Crown
Prince's "drive" in the Argonne resulting in German
advantages is also dealt with.
FROM THE FIELD-MARSHAL COMMANDING-IN-CHIEF THE BRITISH ARMY IN FRANCE
To the Secretary of State for War, War Office, London, S.W.
GENERAL HEADQUARTERS,
June 15, 1915.
My Lord,
I have the honor to report that since the date of my last dispatch
(April 5, 1915) the Army in France under my command has been heavily
engaged opposite both flanks of the line held by the British Forces.
1. In the North the town and district of Ypres has once more in this
campaign been successfully defended against vigorous and sustained
attacks made by large forces of the enemy and supported by a mass of
heavy and field artillery, which, not only in number, but also in
weight and caliber, is superior to any concentration of guns which has
previously assailed that part of the line.
In the South a vigorous offensive has again been taken by troops of
the First Army, in the course of which a large area of entrenched and
fortified ground has been captured from the enemy, whilst valuable
support has been afforded to the attack which our Allies have carried
on with such marked success against the enemy's positions to the east
of Arras and Lens.
2. I much regret that during the period under report the fighting has
been characterized on the enemy's side by a cynical and barbarous
disregard of the well-known usages of civilized war and a flagrant
defiance of The Hague Convention.[2]
[Footnote 2: In a long statement seeking to justify the use of
asphyxiating gases in warfare the semi-official Wolff Telegraph Bureau
asserted in German newspapers of June 25 that the Allies first used
such gases against the Germans, and it cites French documents as proof
that France in February, months before the German advance at Ypres,
made extensive preparations for the application of gases and for
counteracting their effects on the attacking troops.
After quoting the official German war report of April 16 that the
French were making increased use of asphyxiating bombs, the statement
says:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account