New York Times Current History: The European War, Vol. 8, Pt. 2, No. 1, July 1918Various
History
New York Times Current History: The European War, Vol. 8, Pt. 2, No. 1, July 1918
Various
World War, 1914-1918
The new Siberian Government established the Omsk-Nicholaevsk region
notified the Soviet Government at Moscow of the abolition of the
government of soldiers and deputies in Siberia and of the creation
of the new Provisional Government. The notification stated that the
Siberian Government, which is joined by Commander Ivanoff in the
forwarding of communication, does not intend to work for the separation
of Siberia from Russia, and is ready to negotiate for a supply of
provisions to the northern district of Russia.
Should the Council of Commissioners at Moscow, however, attempt to
re-establish the Soviet power in Siberia, it was declared, the Siberian
Government would resist and would discontinue the sending of bread
grains to Northern Russia.
Letters From Trotzky and From Kerensky's War Minister
Two letters from Russian officials, very different in contents but
both of historical significance, were brought to the outside world
by Herman Bernstein, who had been sent to Petrograd by The New York
Herald. One is a confidential letter from Trotzky to Lenine, written at
Brest-Litovsk at the end of the peace conference, as follows:
It is impossible to sign their peace. They have already agreed
with fictitious Governments of Poland, Lithuania, Courland, and
others concerning territorial concessions, military and customs
treaties, in view of self-determination. These provinces,
according to the German interpretation, are already independent
German States, and as independent States have already concluded
territorial and other agreements with Germany and Austria-Hungary.
Today I put these questions squarely and received a reply leaving
no room for misunderstandings. Everything was stenographed.
Tomorrow we shall present the same questions in writing. We cannot
sign their peace.
My plan is this: We announce the termination of the war and
demobilization without signing any peace. We declare we cannot
participate in the looting war of the Allies nor a looting
peace. Poland's, Lithuania's, Courland's fate we place upon the
responsibility of the German working people. The Germans will be
unable to attack us after we declare the war ended. At any rate,
it would be very difficult for Germany to attack us because of
her internal conditions. The Scheidemannists adopted a formal
resolution to break with a Government that makes annexationist
demands of the Russian revolution. The Berliner Tageblatt and
the Vossische Zeitung demand an understanding with Russia by
all means; Centrists favor an agreement. Internal strife is
demoralizing the Government, a bitter controversy is raging in the
press about the struggle on the western front; we declare that we
end the war, but do not sign peace.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account