New York Times Current History: The European War, Vol. 8, Pt. 2, No. 1, July 1918Various
History
New York Times Current History: The European War, Vol. 8, Pt. 2, No. 1, July 1918
Various
World War, 1914-1918
As a result of this important conference, a separate section was
established by the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs to look after
the propaganda in favor of the Allies in the Austro-Hungarian countries
and in their armies. The Austrian Premier, Dr. von Seidler, stated
in his last speech before the adjourning of the Reichsrat that the
Austro-Hungarian Government was fully aware of this propaganda and had
taken measures to combat it. A Slovene paper, the Slovenic, commented
as follows:
The German newspapers have begun at the same time to call the
attention of the Jugoslavs to Italian imperialistic aims and to
show all at once great devotion to our country, which, they say,
is menaced by the Italian peril. With a special affection for our
people, an affection never known before, they urge us to beware of
our Italian neighbors, enumerating all the points of the London
understanding with regard to our territory.
In publishing this agreement the Grazer Tagblatt, that ultra
national German organ, wished to give us a political lesson
of which they might have saved themselves the trouble. It was
superfluous, if for no other reason, because it came from German
nationalists, whose counsels we can never follow.
The Austrian Government and the German newspapers are troubling
themselves in vain as to how to circumvent the Italian propaganda.
It would be of more importance if they would take care to improve
their system of government, the oppression and injustice of which
only help the work of the propaganda. (Further thirty lines
censored.)
PROTEST IN REICHSRAT
The Czecho-Slovak Deputies in the Reichsrat introduced a motion on
April which was suppressed by the Vienna censorship. In the name
of the Slovak Parliamentary Union, the motion, introduced by Deputy
Kalinov, demanded that the Reichsrat refuse to sanction the imperial
ordinance of May 1, 1915, which extended the age of service in the
Landsturm from 43 to 50 years. The arguments presented in support of
this demand, as summarized by a Berne correspondent of the Paris Temps,
constitute a protest of all the Czecho-Slovak nations:
1. Against the war.
2. Against the militarism which, directed by the absolute will of
the monarch, has enchained the free will of nations.
3. Against the military tyranny that has installed itself in
Bohemia, and which is militarizing every stratum of society.
4. Against the spirit and tendencies of the army leaders, who have
made of the army an instrument of Germanization and Magyarization.
5. Against absolutism, because the law has been interpreted in an
unconstitutional manner, without the consent of the Reichsrat.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account