Newton's Principia : $b The mathematical principles of natural philosophyNewton, Isaac
General
Newton's Principia : $b The mathematical principles of natural philosophy
Newton, Isaac
Celestial mechanics -- Early works to 1800; Mechanics -- Early works to 1800
EXAM. 3. Taking m and n for any indices of the powers
of the altitude, and b and c for any given numbers,
suppose the centripetal force to be as ,
that is, as
or (by the method
of converging series above-mentioned) as
,
&c. and comparing the terms of the numerators,
there will arise RGG - RFF + TFF to bTm + cTn as
-FF to -mbTm - 1 - ncTn - 1
,
&c. And taking the
last ratios that arise when the orbits come to a circular form,
there will come forth GG to bTm - 1 + cTn - 1
as FF to mbTm - 1 + ncTn - 1; and again, GG to
FF as bTm - 1 + cTn - 1 to mbTn - 1
+ ncTn - 1. This proportion, by expressing the greatest
altitude CV or T arithmetically by unity, becomes, GG to FF as
b + c to mb + nc, and therefore as 1[Pg 180]
to . Whence G becomes to F, that is, the
angle VCp to the angle VCP, as 1 to .
And therefore since the angle VCP between the upper
and the lower apsis, in an immovable ellipsis, is of 180 deg., the
angle VCp between the same apsides in an orbit which a body
describes with a centripetal force, that is, as
,
will be equal to an angle
of deg. And by the same
reasoning, if the centripetal force be as
,
the angle between the apsides will be
found equal to deg. After the
same manner the Problem is solved in more difficult cases. The quantity
to which the centripetal force is proportional must always be resolved
into a converging series whose denominator is A3. Then the given
part of the numerator arising from that operation is to be supposed
in the same ratio to that part of it which is not given, as the given
part of this numerator RGG - RFF + TFF - FFX is to that part of the
same numerator which is not given. And taking away the superfluous
quantities, and writing unity for T, the proportion of G to F is
obtained.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account