Newton's Principia : $b The mathematical principles of natural philosophyNewton, Isaac
General
Newton's Principia : $b The mathematical principles of natural philosophy
Newton, Isaac
Celestial mechanics -- Early works to 1800; Mechanics -- Early works to 1800
CASE 1. Let the lesser bodies P and S revolve in the same plane about
the greatest body T, the body P describing the interior orbit PAB, and
S[Pg 203] the exterior orbit ESE. Let SK be the mean distance of the bodies
P and S; and let the accelerative attraction of the body P towards S,
at that mean distance, be expressed by that line SK. Make SL to SK as
the square of SK to the square of SP, and SL will be the accelerative
attraction of the body P towards S at any distance SP. Join PT, and
draw LM parallel to it meeting ST in M; and the attraction SL will
be resolved (by Cor. 2, of the Laws of Motion) into the attractions
SM, LM. And so the body P will be urged with a threefold accelerative
force. One of these forces tends towards T, and arises from the mutual
attraction of the bodies T and P. By this force alone the body P would
describe round the body T, by the radius PT, areas proportional to the
times, and an ellipsis whose focus is in the centre of the body T; and
this it would do whether the body T remained unmoved, or whether it
were agitated by that attraction. This appears from Prop. XI, and Cor.
2 and 3 of Theor. XXI. The other force is that of the attraction LM,
which, because it tends from P to T, will be superadded to and coincide
with the former force; and cause the areas to be still proportional to
the times, by Cor. 3, Theor. XXI. But because it is not reciprocally
proportional to the square of the distance PT, it will compose, when
added to the former, a force varying from that proportion; which
variation will be the greater by how much the proportion of this force
to the former is greater, cæteris paribus. Therefore, since by
Prop. XI, and by Cor. 2, Theor. XXI, the force with which the ellipsis
is described about the focus T ought to be directed to that focus, and
to be reciprocally proportional to the square of the distance PT, that
compounded force varying from that proportion will make the orbit PAB
vary from the figure of an ellipsis that has its focus in the point T;
and so much the more by how much the variation from that proportion is
greater; and by consequence by how much the proportion of the second
force LM to the first force is greater, cæteris paribus. But
now the third force SM, attracting the body P in a direction parallel
to ST, composes with the other forces a new force which is no longer
directed from P to T; and which varies so much more from this direction
by how much the proportion of this third force to the other forces
is greater, cæteris paribus; and therefore causes the body P
to describe, by the radius TP, areas no longer proportional to the
times; and therefore makes the variation from that proportionality so
much greater by how much the proportion of this force to the others is
greater. But this third force will increase the variation of the orbit
PAB from the[Pg 204] elliptical figure before-mentioned upon two accounts;
first because that force is not directed from P to T; and, secondly,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account