Newton's Principia : $b The mathematical principles of natural philosophyNewton, Isaac
General
Newton's Principia : $b The mathematical principles of natural philosophy
Newton, Isaac
Celestial mechanics -- Early works to 1800; Mechanics -- Early works to 1800
As the order of the parts of time is immutable, so also is the order
of the parts of space. Suppose those parts to be moved out of their
places, and they will be moved (if the expression may be allowed) out
of themselves. For times and spaces are, as it were, the places as well
of themselves as of all other things. All things are placed in time as
to order of succession; and in space as to order of situation. It is
from their essence or nature that they are places; and that the primary
places of things should be moveable, is absurd. These are therefore the
absolute places; and translations out of those places, are the only
absolute motions.
But because the parts of space cannot be seen, or distinguished from
one another by our senses, therefore in their stead we use sensible
measures of them. For from the positions and distances of things from
any body considered as immovable, we define all places; and then with
respect to such places, we estimate all motions, considering bodies as
transferred from some of those places into others. And so, instead of
absolute places and motions, we use relative ones; and that without any
inconvenience in common affairs; but in philosophical disquisitions,
we ought to abstract from our senses, and consider things themselves,
distinct from what are only sensible measures of them. For it may be
that there is no body really at rest, to which the places and motions
of others may be referred.
But we may distinguish rest and motion, absolute and relative, one from
the other by their properties, causes and effects. It is a property of
rest, that bodies really at rest do rest in respect to one another. And
therefore as it is possible, that in the remote regions of the fixed
stars, or perhaps far beyond them, there may be some body absolutely
at rest; but impossible to know, from the position of bodies to one
another in our regions whether any of these do keep the same position
to that remote body; it follows that absolute rest cannot be determined
from the position of bodies in our regions.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account