Newton's Principia : $b The mathematical principles of natural philosophyNewton, Isaac
General
Newton's Principia : $b The mathematical principles of natural philosophy
Newton, Isaac
Celestial mechanics -- Early works to 1800; Mechanics -- Early works to 1800
Those things which have been demonstrated of curve lines, and the
superfices which they comprehend, may be easily applied to the curve
superfices and contents of solids. These Lemmas are premised to
avoid the tediousness of deducing perplexed demonstrations ad
absurdum, according to the method of the ancient geometers. For
demonstrations are more contracted by the method of indivisibles:
but because the hypothesis of indivisibles seems somewhat harsh, and
therefore that method is reckoned less geometrical, I chose rather
to reduce the demonstrations of the following propositions to the
first and last sums and ratios of nascent and evanescent quantities,
that is, to the limits of those sums and ratios; and so to premise,
as short as I could, the demonstrations of those limits. For hereby
the same thing is performed as by the method of indivisibles; and
now those principles being demonstrated, we may use them with more
safety. Therefore if hereafter I should happen to consider quantities
as made up of particles, or should use little curve lines for right
ones, I would not be understood to mean indivisibles, but evanescent
divisible quantities; not the sums and ratios of determinate parts,
but always the limits of sums and ratios; and that the force of such
demonstrations always depends on the method laid down in the foregoing
Lemmas.
Perhaps it may be objected, that there is no ultimate proportion, of
evanescent quantities; because the proportion, before the quantities
have vanished, is not the ultimate, and when they are vanished, is
none. But by the same argument, it may be alledged, that a body
arriving at a certain place, and there stopping, has no ultimate
velocity: because the velocity, before the body comes to the place,
is not its ultimate velocity; when it has arrived, is none. But the
answer is easy; for by the ultimate velocity, is meant that with which
the body is moved, neither before it arrives at its last place and the
motion ceases, nor after, but at the very instant it arrives; that is,
that velocity with which the body arrives at its last place, and with
which the motion ceases. And in like manner, by the ultimate ratio of
evanescent quantities is to be understood the ratio of the quantities[Pg 103]
not before they vanish, nor afterwards, but with which they vanish. In
like manner the first ratio of nascent quantities is that with which
they begin to be. And the first or last sum is that with which they
begin and cease to be (or to be augmented or diminished). There is a
limit which the velocity at the end of the motion may attain, but not
exceed. This is the ultimate velocity. And there is the like limit
in all quantities and proportions that begin and cease to be. And
since such limits are certain and definite, to determine the same is
a problem strictly geometrical. But whatever is geometrical we may be
allowed to use in determining and demonstrating any other thing that is
likewise geometrical.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account