Nicaragua : $b its people, scenery, monuments, resources, condition, and proposed canalSquier, E. G. (Ephraim George)
History
Nicaragua : $b its people, scenery, monuments, resources, condition, and proposed canal
Squier, E. G. (Ephraim George)
Nicaragua; Nicaragua -- Description and travel; Nicaragua Canal (Nicaragua)
It is not to be doubted that the men who were the promoters of the
Independence, and most active in the establishment of the Republic, were
very little under priestly influence; for one of the first acts of the
National Constituent Assembly was to prohibit the sale of Papal
indulgences, and to limit the exactions of the Church. This policy
arrayed the priestly influence against the new order of things, and it
was henceforth exercised in favor of the aristocratical, monarchical, or
Servile faction, against the Liberals and the Republic,—thus becoming
one of the causes of many of the disasters to which the country has
since been subjected. Yet the zeal of the Priests did not fail to react
upon themselves. They entered into the arena of politics, and were
treated as partisans in the civil contests. They espoused the cause of
an obnoxious faction, and came to share its odium as well as its
misfortunes. The Liberals, emancipated from the machinery of the Church,
soon began to look with incredulity on its doctrines, and with contempt
on its forms; and although the people of Central America are still
nominally Catholics, yet amongst those capable of reflection, or
possessed of education, there are more who are destitute of any fixed
creed, rationalists, or what are sometimes called free thinkers, than
Catholics, or adherents of any form of religion. Many of the priests
share in the general skepticism.
The first decided encounter between the Church and the Republic, was in
1825, when the people of San Salvador, the stronghold of Liberalism,
dissatisfied with the political tendencies of the Bishop of Guatemala,
under whose ecclesiastical jurisdiction they were, elected a Bishop of
their own, in defiance of the Archbishop and the Pope. This example was
soon after followed by Nicaragua. The ignorant priesthood, the friars of
Quesaltenango, siding with the Archbishop and the Serviles, infuriated
by this and other bold innovations, contrived to excite the Indians in
Los Altos, who in their fury cruelly slaughtered the vice-president of
the Republic; and for a time the Liberals were overwhelmed by the
coalition. They, however, afterwards rallied under Gen. Morazan. During
his enlightened and vigorous sway, in 1829, it was discovered that the
Archbishop was intriguing against the government; and it was then the
Church received a blow from which it can never recover. Morazan was not
a man to be trifled with; he boldly seized the Archbishop, and sent him
out of the country under a guard of soldiers, forbidding his return
under penalty of death. The monks and friars belonging to the various
convents and monasteries of Guatemala, who were deeply concerned with
the Archbishop, were expelled in an equally summary manner. But the
measures thus commenced did not stop here. The Legislature of Guatemala
decreed the suppression of all the male convents, prohibited females
from becoming nuns for the future, and appropriated the revenues of the
suppressed monasteries.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account