Nicolaus of Damascus' life of Augustus : $b Translated with a commentaryNicolaus, of Damascus
History
Nicolaus of Damascus' life of Augustus : $b Translated with a commentary
Nicolaus, of Damascus
Augustus, Emperor of Rome, 63 B.C.-14 A.D.; Emperors -- Rome -- Biography -- Early works to 1800; Thesis (Ph. D.)
[135] Between the sections 27 and 28 the excerptor has perhaps
omitted a portion of his original material. Much of what is told
by Nicolaus in section 27 is given in far greater detail than is
the case with the other historians. The events related in this
chapter, especially the interchange of messengers between Antony
and Lepidus and Brutus and Cassius, have been thought to have had
a very close connection with the circumstances which occasioned
the writing of Cic., Fam., 11, 1, a letter from D. Brutus to M.
Brutus and Cassius. O. E. Schmidt, Neue Jahrb. für Philol. und
Paed., 129, wishes therefore to date the letter in the morning
of March 17; P. Gröbe, Drumann-Gröbe Geschichte Roms, 1^2, p.
411 ff., would place the letter still earlier, on March 16. E.
T. Merrill, Class. Philol. 10, p. 241 ff., has now shown that D.
Brutus’ allusions to the disposition of Antony and Hirtius toward
him may well have been relevant to a later period, and hence
he would set the date of the letter as late as April 10, thus
approximating Schmidt’s original view, which gave April 5 as the
probable time of writing (Die Correspondenz Ciceros in den Jahren
44 und 43, Marburg 1883). It follows therefore that chapter 27
of Nicolaus should not be employed as a criterion on the date of
Cic., Fam., 11, 1.
28. [136] Lacuna, which is apparently quite long, for the affairs
mentioned in the following belong to June and July, whereas the
story of Octavian told before chapter 19 was only of his return
to Rome in April.
[137] The aedile Critonius is probably referred to (compare
App. 3, 28). The proper name may have been lost in the lacuna
immediately above.
[138] Compare Appian 3, 28; Dio 45, 6; Suetonius, Caes., 88;
Plutarch, Ant., 16; Pliny, N. H., 2, 23. Since both Appian and
Nicolaus refer to two controversies between Octavian and Antony,
of which the second was at the time of the festival of Venus
Genetrix in July, the question has arisen as to what the earlier
occasion could have been. The ‘ludi Cereales’ are precluded, for
Octavian was in Campania during the period in which they were
held, April 12-19 (Cic., Att., 14, 12, 2). The ‘ludi Florales’
were given April 28-May 3, and since Cicero on May 22 referred to
the episode of the throne (Att. 15, 3, 2) these must have been
the games at which Octavian experienced his difficulty for the
first time, unless it can be shown that the ‘ludi Cereales’ were
postponed for a month, in which event they would have also been
completed just prior to Cicero’s letter of May 22.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account