Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 1 (of 3)Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 1 (of 3)
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Rome -- History
of the southern ones; even an alliance with Rome may be conjectured.
The danger was, however, so great, that every jealousy must have been
hushed by it. The natural road for the Gauls would have been down by
the shores of the Adriatic; then through the country of the Umbrians,
who were tributary to them, and already completely broken down; and
through the Romagna, across the Apennines. The Apennines, however,
which separate Tuscany and the Romagna, are very difficult to pass
over, and particularly troublesome for beasts of burthen. As from this
side, therefore, which the Etruscans moreover had purposely allowed
to grow wild, the Gauls could not break in, though they had made an
attempt to do so, they then crossed the Apennines near Clusium, and
appeared before this town. Clusium is the key of the valley of the
Tiber; if it were taken, this as well as the road on the Arno would be
open to the Gauls, who might then advance upon Arezzo in its rear. The
Romans therefore looked upon the fate of Clusium as decisive of their
own. The people of Clusium solicit the alliance of powerful Rome; the
Romans with well-judged readiness accede to it, and send an embassy
to the Gauls, ordering them to go away. According to a more probable
account, the latter had demanded from the Clusians the division of
the land, as a condition of peace; not, as it was customary among the
Romans, as a charge imposed upon a people already conquered: if this be
correct, the Romans sent that embassy trusting to their might. But the
Gauls treated the ambassadors with scorn, and these allowed themselves
to be carried away by their military ardour to join the Etruscans in
fighting against them: it may perhaps have been only a small isolated
affray. This is what Livy tells us; and he proceeds to state, that
the Gauls, as soon as they had become aware of this violation of the
law of nations, had caused the signal for retreat to be sounded, and
had called upon the gods for vengeance, intending forthwith to march
against Rome. Here is evidently a mere legend. A barbarous people could
not possibly have entertained such regards; nor was there in this case
any real violation of international law, as the Romans stood in no
connexion whatever with the Gauls. But the fall of Rome must needs be
laid to the account of a _Nefas_, against which no power of man could
avail. Roman vanity besides plays its part; and the ambassadors were
said to have so greatly distinguished themselves, that they were more
conspicuous than the Etruscans. In contradiction to these events, it
is now stated that the Gauls had sent to Rome to demand the giving up
of those ambassadors; that the senate hesitated and left the decision
to the people, on which the latter not only refused compliance, but
even appointed the same ambassadors as military tribunes; and that
in consequence the Gauls with all their force immediately marched
against the surprised city. Livy here again speaks of the _Populus_,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account