Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 2 (of 3)Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 2 (of 3)
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Rome -- History
Philip was at that time very young, hardly in his twenty-first or
second year. His father Demetrius II. had left him at his death yet
a child, and had given him for guardian an uncle, or elder cousin,
Antigonus Epitropus (likewise called Doson). This Antigonus showed
a conscientiousness which, considering the time in which he lived,
really awakens our wonder; he seems to have taken as much care of the
education of his ward, as of his rights: of this we see the traces in
Philip, especially in the first years of his reign, in which he is said
to have been very amiable. But there was something bad-hearted in him,
which soon shook off that influence: like an eastern youth, he then
wallowed in lust. Yet he was endowed with remarkable talents; he was
highly gifted as a general, and he had courage and skill, to employ
and to increase the resources of his empire. In the war against the
Romans under Flamininus, he displayed much ability; and when in the
peace he had lost part of his kingdom, he cleverly took advantage of
circumstances to be set up again by Rome herself. Thus he managed to
leave behind to his son a power, such as he himself had never possessed
before.
The empire of Macedon, during the latter days of Antigonus Gonatas,
had fallen into decay: the Ætolians had risen, the Achæans had made
themselves free. Under Demetrius, it was going down hill still faster.
From this condition, it only recovered in the last years of the
guardianship of Antigonus, and that by the treason of old Aratus,
who sacrificed the whole glory of a well-spent life; for he chose,
rather to yield up Corinth and the liberty of Greece, and to make
the Achæans sink into utter insignificance, than to let Cleomenes
have that authority in the state, which was due to him, and without
which the Lacedæmonians could not have joined the Achæan league.
Philip, in the beginning of his reign, had, in conjunction with the
Achæans, undertaken a war against the Ætolians, by which the latter
were considerably humbled, important fortresses in Thessaly having
been taken from them and their estimation in Greece lowered. They were
obliged to agree to a disadvantageous peace, yet they still kept their
independence. When Philip leagued himself with Hannibal, and began the
war with the Romans, Greece was at peace. Thessaly, with the exception
of that part which was Ætolian, Phocis, Locris, Eubœa with Chalcis,
Corinth, Heræa, and Aliphera were well affected to Macedon, and had
Macedonian garrisons. The Achæans were nominally free and united,
but in reality dependent on their allies the Macedonians; so were
likewise the Bœotians and Acarnanians. The Ætolians, who were hostile,
were free, and had a territory of considerable extent. In Lacedæmon,
at that time one revolution followed upon another: it was subjected
to a nominal king, probably a son of Eudamidas; but soon afterwards
Machanidas seized upon the government. The Syrian kings ruled over
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account