Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 2 (of 3)Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 2 (of 3)
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Rome -- History
It is a most erroneous thing, for one to believe that a constitution
remains the same, so long as its outward forms still last. When
alterations have taken place in the distribution of property, in
public opinion, and in the way in which people live, the constitution,
even without any outward change, may become quite different from what
it was, and the self-same form may at one time be democratical, and
at another aristocratical. This internal revolution is hardly ever
traced by modern writers of history, and yet it is one of those very
things which in history ought to be particularly searched into. That
strange and wonderful preponderance of the oligarchy of wealth existed
already at that time in Rome, and the many--who generally speaking have
neither judgment nor a will of their own--now decree the very things
which they did not wish. Here indeed we have one of the first and most
remarkable symptoms of this: the people, contrary to their own wishes,
vote for the war with Philip. It was the great misfortune of Rome,
that after the war of Hannibal, there was no great man who had the
genius to restore the constitution in accordance with its spirit. For
great states always decline and fall, because, after great exertions,
everything is left to the blind spirit of the age, and no healing of
what is diseased is attempted.
The Romans now, with great zeal, sent ambassadors to Philip to demand
indemnification for the Athenians, and cessation of all hostilities
against the allies of Rome, to the number of whom Ptolemy also
belonged. Philip clearly saw that this was but a pretext to raise a
quarrel, and he had bitterly to repent of not having taken better
advantage of the war with Hannibal. In the year 552, the war was
decreed, and the command was given to the consul P. Sulpicius Galba,
who had already made a campaign before in those parts, though not of
the most glorious kind, as he devastated Dyme, Oreus, and Ægina. It
must have been resolved upon late in the season, and as the consul
besides fell ill, nothing more could be undertaken that year: Galba’s
expedition therefore entirely belongs to the year which followed his
consulship, a fact which is overlooked by Livy. Villius, the next
consul, was only present at the seat of war for a very short period,
towards the end of his time of office.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account