Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 2 (of 3)Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 2 (of 3)
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Rome -- History
upon: he was to send ambassadors to Rome, and in the meanwhile to
furnish supplies to the Roman army, and to pay a contribution.
The Romans were inclined to peace, as there had begun to be much
ill-blood between them and the Ætolians. These had plundered the
Macedonian camp after the battle of Cynoscephalæ, and in consequence
dissension had arisen. The Romans were in much greater numbers in that
fight than the Ætolians; but the cavalry of the Ætolians had indeed
decided the victory, and moreover, in the beginning these had stood the
brunt of the battle on the heights, by which the Romans were enabled
to make an orderly retreat. As there was no blinking these arguments,
the Ætolians, even if they had not been a vain people, might very well
have taken to themselves the honour of the victory; and this indeed
they did in a way which gave great offence to the sensitive Flamininus,
who therefore, immediately after the day was won, tried to cut them out
of all its advantages. Throughout the whole of Greece, the Ætolians
were sung of as conquerors, and the Romans with their consul looked
upon only as auxiliaries: there came out at that time a fine epigram
still extant of Alcæus of Messene on the victory of Cynoscephalæ, full
of scorn against Philip, in which it is said in plain words that the
Ætolians, and with them the Latins under T. Quinctius, had beaten the
Macedonians, and that thirty thousand Macedonians had been slain. This
insolence the Greeks had dearly to pay for, as Flamininus was provoked
by it; yet it would have done them still greater mischief, had any
other than he been general. It is difficult to form an idea of the
blind infatuation of the Ætolians,--a people, whose territory was not
larger than the canton of Berne, and who yet could have been mad enough
to think themselves the equals of the Romans: one of their generals,
who had a quarrel with Flamininus, told him, that arms would decide it
on the banks of the Tiber. The only clue for this is in the character
of the southern nations, who, though unable to do anything, fancy that
they can do everything. Even so it was with the Spaniards in their
relations with the English: they are always talking of the immortal day
of Salamanca, on which they beat the French, whereas they did not lose
more than one man in that battle. And thus did the Ætolians, without
any substantial cause, become at variance with the Romans. It is true
that Flamininus was too irritable: he ought to have treated this with
contempt, as his mission to give freedom to Greece was such a fine one.
Nor were the Romans by any means just to the Ætolians: by the original
conditions, these had a right to claim the restoration of all the
places which had been taken from them by Philip; but the Romans decided
against them, and they either kept the places themselves, or embodied
them with other states, or else they left them independent. This would
not have happened, unless there had been indeed some provocation; but
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account