Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 2 (of 3)Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 2 (of 3)
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Rome -- History
We have now reached much beyond the times of the development of the
constitution at home, and the rest of the history has not for us the
same interest which it had for the ancients. Even the wars are losing
that grand character which arose from the display of native energy.
What sort of a subject for description, for instance, is the battle of
Magnesia, in which a well-ordered Roman army came off victorious over
a horde of eastern barbarians, which did not even deserve the name
of army? Some wars, like the Cimbric, form an exception. Livy from
henceforth becomes more and more diffuse; for he had other interests in
his history, and more than two-thirds of his work are taken up by the
two centuries which now follow. We are going to adopt just the opposite
plan, and are able to be more and more concise.
The Insubrians had risen against the Romans. During the second Punic
war, they had been quiet; except in the first years, they took no part
in it, as the scene of operations was in general too far distant from
them, and they kept up but little communication with Hannibal. But now
they were in arms, and the Romans met with peculiar difficulty, owing
to Hamilcar, an enterprising Carthaginian who had remained behind from
Mago’s army, and had organised the Ligurian and Gallic forces. The
Insubrians were very different from the Boians: the former made their
submission after one or two campaigns; but the war with the latter
lasted to the tenth year. They defended themselves with distinguished
bravery, and they destroyed the fortresses of Placentia and Cremona;
for they knew that the Romans were carrying on against them a war
of extermination, and they therefore fought with all the energy of
despair. Historians do not state as explicitly as a fragment of Cato
does, that they were utterly rooted out. The fate of this people is
remarkable. After their emigration from Gaul, they had either turned
themselves to Italy, or had gone to the Danube: in Gaul, their seats
are now hardly known; in the country near the Danube, they were
probably exterminated in the Cimbric war, and hence the _desertum
Boiorum_ (_Böheim_, Bohemia), which was afterwards occupied by the
Marcomanni: in Italy they are said to have had a hundred and twelve
cantons. That in Italy they were extirpated, and that there could
therefore have been no question about them, was not at all understood
by the jurists who have written on the _lex de Gallia Cisalpina_.
But all the Celts south of the Po were destroyed, and the whole of
their land taken up by Roman colonies: Bologna, Modena, Parma, and
also Lucca, were founded at that time, and received a considerable
territory. Yet even in the days of Polybius, that country was nearly
without inhabitants, and it was repeopled only by slow degrees. The
_Lex Julia_ united the Cispadana as to political rights with Italy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account