Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 2 (of 3)Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 2 (of 3)
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Rome -- History
an answer; the citizens spread themselves about the town and fell upon
the Lacedæmonians; everywhere the houses were searched to see whether
any Lacedæmonian had hidden himself within, and not even that of the
Roman ambassadors was spared. The first of these, Aurelius Orestes, was
bent upon revenge; but the Roman senate was not yet inclined to inflict
immediate punishment. We find it often stated that Corinth had been
destroyed _ob pulsatos legatos_; this is not to be understood literally
of personal violence, _pulsare_ being the technical expression for
every violation of the law of nations. Even a derogatory _appellatio_
of the ambassador, by which his dignity was insulted, was termed
_pulsatio_.
The Roman senate did not trust its allies, and again sent
commissioners; so that the Achæans might have easily saved themselves
by submission. The demand of the Romans was a most glaring injustice;
but unhappily there is henceforward in all the dealings of the Roman
people with foreign nations, nothing but insolence and unrighteousness.
And yet, now that the moral interest of the Roman history is quite at
an end, a new one begins: the history of Rome becomes neither more
nor less than the general history of those ages, and the events in
the latter which find no place in the former, are so insignificant
that they cannot be made into an independent history. Now though the
Achæans could hardly have succeeded in getting the Romans to desist
from their demands, they ought at all events to have submitted to their
will: it was madness to kick against it. But it was with them as with
the ill-fated Jews, in that last struggle with the Romans of which we
read the history in Josephus; those who had the language of freedom on
their lips, were the fiercest tyrants of the nation. He who votes for
yielding to necessity, is often held to be a vile traitor; the man, on
the contrary, who is for risking everything, is looked up to as a lover
of his country. The prophet Jeremy already had good reason to complain
of the false prophets who beguiled the people to mad undertakings.
Just so it was with the Achæans. Those among them who talked the most
loudly of freedom, were by no means its best friends; the true patriots
indeed were those who gave their advice for peace. The Romans were now
still waiting for more favourable circumstances, as they were not in
a condition to take the field, on account of the Macedonian and Punic
wars: embassies therefore went backwards and forwards on both sides.
Achaia had formerly been under the lead of Callicrates, one of its
citizens, who had sold himself to the Romans; and it was now under the
influence of a couple of madmen, Critolaus and Diæus, his most violent
foes, who were for resistance, even to the last gasp. Critolaus amused
the Roman ambassadors. As the Achæans only met twice a-year, he now
sent to call one of these meetings, and promised to introduce the Roman
ambassadors; but he secretly warned all the members not to come, and
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account