Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 2 (of 3)Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 2 (of 3)
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Rome -- History
tillage had formerly been mostly the business of the freedmen, and it
was only of late that it had fallen into the hands of the slaves. The
war had now reached its fourth year; several Roman armies had been
utterly routed, and it required a consular one under P. Rupilius to
reduce the island (620): for the slaves were masters of the strongest
places, Enna and Tauromenium, and they had for their leader Eunus
(Εὔνους), a Syrian, who, like Jean François at St. Domingo in the year
1791, put on the diadem in due form. The struggle was carried on with
the same relentless cruelty which slaves have met with everywhere, as
in the West Indies and in North America. Sicily was laid utterly waste
by it, and thirty years afterwards, the same circumstances led to the
same results. The details are awfully interesting; yet, as we have
said before, they are not in their place here.
In the meanwhile, Attalus Philometor of Pergamus, the son of Eumenes,
died, and with him the race of Philetærus became extinct. The first
kings of Pergamus whom the Romans had raised to greatness, were on the
whole clever men and mild princes; and under their rule the country
flourished: this state of things was a desirable one, although, if
looked upon in a moral point of view, much might be said against it.
But the last Attalus was a tyrant and a wicked wretch, such as is
only to be met with in the East, where a certain perversity reaches
its highest pitch, and takes delight in what is most unnatural and
revolting: in a word, he was an incarnate fiend, like Sultan Ibrahim.
The only art in which he employed himself, was that of cultivating
deadly plants and of preparing poison: it was sport to him, to get
those who were his nearest kindred out of the world. He bequeathed
the whole of his kingdom to the Romans; and indeed he could not well
have done otherwise, as every one of his dispositions had still to be
approved of by the Romans, who would hardly have acknowledged the rule
of any one else. They took it as a property which of right belonged
to them, very much as a master might take the goods of one of his
freedmen who had not been fully emancipated, and had died without
leaving a will. Thus Rome had a new province, which, however, was to
be won by the sword, as Aristonicus, a bastard son of Eumenes, laid
claim to the throne. According to the notions of the East, this defect
of birth was not a bar to the succession, so that, but for the will of
Attalus, he would have been the lawful heir. He had very little trouble
in getting hold of the diadem soon after the death of his brother;
for the people had a horror of the Roman rule, and they had learned
to know the tyranny and rapacity of the Roman prætors and proconsuls
who made their appearance every year: many towns declared for him;
others, like Ephesus, which had lately gained their freedom by the
help of Rome, took up arms against him. How he came to believe that
he could hold out, is quite inconceivable. He had no aid whatever: in
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account