Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 2 (of 3)Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 2 (of 3)
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Rome -- History
The changes in the constitution of Rome in those days, are most of them
unimportant, as the distinction between patrician and plebeian was
now at an end. In 622, for the first time, two plebeians are censors;
in 580 already, both the consuls were from the same order. Here we
find this entry in the Capitoline Fasti, _ambo primi de plebe_: Livy
makes no remark whatever about it, circumstances having become so ripe
for the change, that no one even thought any longer of putting any
obstacle in the way of a plebeian. Dionysius says, that in his time
not more than fifty patrician families were still left, which is to
be understood of actual families, and not of _gentes_, of which there
may have been only about fifteen. As _gentes_, they are no longer held
in any account: these had lost their importance together with the
curies. In a _gens_, moreover, all the families were not ennobled:
of the Claudia, there was only one; of the Valeria, the Messalæ; the
Cornelia consisted of Scipiones, Lentuli, Cethegi, Sullæ (these last
being added but of late); in the Æmilia, were the Lepidi, and perhaps
also the Scauri. But of the plebeian _familiæ nobiles_ there was a very
great number, and they were still ever increasing. Of the senate, by
far the larger part belonged to them; ever since the end of the war
with Hannibal, most of the prætors were likewise plebeians, scarcely
one out of six being a patrician: nor does it seem as if any stress
had been laid on it; it was merely the effect of time. In the troubles
of the Gracchi, we find the families quite indiscriminately in both
parties. Appius Claudius, sprung from a family which in former times
had headed the patricians against the plebeians, was the father-in-law
of Tib. Gracchus, and sided with him, and carried through all the laws
put forth by him; whilst, on the other hand, those, who were the most
enraged against the Gracchi, and the most interested in withstanding
them, were, with the exception of Scipio Nasica, all of them plebeians.
The feuds had long been settled, and they had passed to the _novi
homines_ and _nobiles_, the latter of whom were in the last century
very incorrectly called patricians, especially by foreigners (the
French). This change has been known ever since the revival of learning.
The censorship remained forty years longer than the consulship in the
possession of the patricians; for as the elections for this were only
every five years, there were still men enough to fill it.
About the same time, the holding the ædileship by turns must have been
done away with; and certainly this office must of late have been a
heavy burthen upon the patricians, as it entailed considerable expense.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account