Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 2 (of 3)Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 2 (of 3)
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Rome -- History
was also in those times. Livius did away with the tithes with which
the lands were still burthened; and instead of the two colonies which
Gracchus had proposed, he founded twelve, each of which was to consist
of three thousand citizens. This the rich could easily grant, the
only losers by it being the old inhabitants, unhappy men who hitherto
had dwelt by sufferance on the soil where their ancestors had been
conquered; for the estates of the rich were only in those places where
the old towns had been destroyed. With regard to these colonies of
Livius, we may ask, have they really been founded? There seems to
be no doubt of it, as those of Gracchus were certainly established;
indeed they were in all likelihood those _duodecim coloniæ_ in
Cicero’s oration _pro Cæcina_, about which there has been so much
controversy. These cannot have had any reference to what happened in
the war with Hannibal, when the number of those which had remained
faithful was eighteen; so that eighteen and not twelve must have had
the _commercium_ given them as a boon. The MSS. have XII.: it has been
proposed to write XIIX. instead; but this kind of notation is not met
with in any of the old manuscripts. If, as I take it for granted, they
were not twelve new colonies, but twelve Latin towns which, as they had
a great deal of unoccupied ground, were increased by three thousand
citizens, it is quite easy to understand why they had better rights
than the other colonies.
Gracchus saw that the thoughtless people turned away from him to the
senate, and to the tools of the senate who deceived them. There are
many men, frank and kindly souls, who heartily love the Beautiful, and
are delighted at seeing distinguished men play their part, and look
upon them as the ornaments of their age; others think of nothing but
themselves: driven on by envy and jealousy, and grieved at hearing
any name praised be it ever so slightly, even when it does not harm
them in the least, they are glad if they can discover any weaknesses
in great men. All this tribe now raised an outcry against Gracchus,
laughing at him as a _doctrinaire_, a man of crotchets and theories.
He had now for so long a time enjoyed great consideration, and he
stood forth in too full a blaze of light not to become an eyesore
to many people; just as the Athenian citizen gave his vote against
Aristides, because he was called the Just. Thus it came to pass, that
when he again offered himself as a candidate for the tribuneship, he
was rejected; nor is there any reason to believe that his colleagues
had been guilty of foul play. Among the independent educated middle
classes only, Gracchus seems to have had many partisans; but these
had not much political weight, and his friends of high rank were
hot-headed people. In the year 631, his enemy L. Opimius, the destroyer
of Fregellæ, whom, the year before, he had kept out of the consulship,
was chosen consul. For when he was in the heyday of his popularity, he
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account