Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 2 (of 3)Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 2 (of 3)
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Rome -- History
The Roman province now reached as far as Dauphiné.
The Allobroges in that country, though they acknowledged the _majestas
populi Romani_, did not become subjects; but Provence and Lower
Languedoc, were real provinces, although there was not always a prætor
there. The time when the Roman provincial institutions were introduced,
cannot be exactly made out, owing to the loss of the books of Livy.
Aquæ Sextiæ was the first Roman colony beyond the Alps.
In 638 the Cimbri make their first appearance. After the reduction
of Dalmatia, the Romans had attacked Carniola, which is said to have
roused the anger of the Scordiscans. It is, however, more likely
that the immigration of the Sarmatians from the east stirred up the
Scordiscans, who now fell upon Macedon and Greece. This was one of the
greatest calamities of the unfortunate sixth and seventh centuries
of the city, which were some of the most awful for the world itself;
just as the sixteenth and seventeenth of our era in modern history:
it destroyed most of the beautiful works of ancient art. In Italy,
that havoc went on until the times of Augustus, which were the first
beginning of a kind of material prosperity. The consul C. Porcius Cato
was routed in Thrace by the Scordiscans, and Macedon, Thessaly, and
part of Greece, were overrun by the barbarians.
THE WAR AGAINST JUGURTHA. Q. CÆCILIUS METELLUS NUMIDICUS. C. MARIUS.
Sallust’s description of the war against Jugurtha, is one of the best
specimens which we have in either language of the ancient literature,
and I would even rate it above that of Catiline’s conspiracy. They are
monographies, almost the only ones which the Romans had, except perhaps
the history of the war with Hannibal by Cœlius Antipater, of which,
however, we know nothing: the memoirs of Fannius were something quite
different. Sallust takes indeed the utmost care to avoid anything that
has an annalistic look; he leaves out every mention of dates, to give
his work the greatest possible finish. It is a book which, the more one
reads it, the more worthy of admiration it seems: it is a real study
for every one who wants to know what excellent historical writing is.
To him I refer you.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account