Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 2 (of 3)Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 2 (of 3)
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Rome -- History
speaking here of real virtue before God, but only of political virtue.
This was the case, for instance, in England with Shaftesbury and
others in the seventeenth century. I knew one of the most eminent men
of our own day, who (with the consent indeed of his government) very
indelicately availed himself of an advantage, whereas at other times he
showed himself to be a true hero. The leading features in the character
of Scaurus, are very great pride, very determined party spirit, and
first-rate talent. That his behaviour during the war with Jugurtha is
not an invention of Sallust’s, may be seen from the history itself.
In the commission at Utica, Scaurus was blameless; just as in former
times. After Adherbal’s downfall, the consul L. Calpurnius Bestia
wished to enrich himself by an African war, or at all events to be
able to sell a peace; he therefore joined with some lovers of justice
in moving that Jugurtha should be brought to punishment, and he also
managed to be sent out to Africa with that commission. The war began in
good earnest; but negotiations were soon set on foot, Jugurtha having
convinced Bestia and Scaurus that this was more for their advantage. He
remained indeed in possession of his kingdom; but to save appearances,
he surrendered himself _in fidem populi Romani_; so that the senate
only had to ratify the peace, the _fœdus_ being changed into a
_clientela_. He delivered up the deserters, thirty elephants, and much
cattle; and he bound himself to pay several instalments of money. Yet
the whole thing was but a vile farce. Instead of the deserters being
sent to Rome, where they were to be put to death, they were allowed to
run away; and the elephants were returned to Jugurtha for money. This
treaty, however, raised such an outcry at Rome, that a bold tribune
of the name of C. Memmius got the people to have the matter inquired
into; and L. Cassius, who at that time was honoured as the justest of
men, was commissioned personally to investigate the case in Africa
itself. Cassius, beyond all doubt, was a man of very high rank,--a
patrician,[82] but not identified with any party: being himself pure in
a corrupt time, he condemned without any respect of persons. Cassius’
word of honour was of such weight, that Jugurtha on the strength of it
deemed himself quite safe in going to Rome, and publicly making his
appearance there. Here we find Jugurtha--and this is a marked feature
in the whole of his deportment--wavering between his own boldness and
the feeling that he was not able to withstand the power of Rome. He
was on the point of giving up his accomplices; but a tribune of the
people had been bribed to forbid his speaking, just as he was getting
up in the assembly of the people. Thus the authority of the tribunes
had become powerful for evil, but powerless for good. During his stay
in Rome, Jugurtha caused another descendant of Masinissa, Massiva, a
young Numidian, who likewise happened to be there at the very time, and
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account