Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 2 (of 3)Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 2 (of 3)
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Rome -- History
was, he commanded, he stood forth as a superior, and never bowed before
any one, nor ever sinned against truth. Such a man I admire and love,
almost without any qualification. That he let Decius Magius go from
Capua, was not policy: it was a greatness of mind of which very few
only would have been capable. Scipio could have done it.
The third general of this war, Q. Fabius Maximus, had gained some
reputation already in the former obscure contest: the surname
of Maximus, however, is inherited from his grandfather, or
great-grandfather, Q. Fabius Rullianus in the days of the Samnite
wars, who received it when he separated the four city tribes from the
country ones. He acted in what seemed to him the fittest way, and was
net afraid of doing what might be mistaken in him for cowardice. _Unus
homo nobis cunctando restituit rem_, says Ennius. He was a very good
general; he had coolness, circumspection, and quickness of eye: but he
has been much overrated notwithstanding. Daun has been compared to him,
and there were many who thought that this was doing too much honour to
the Austrian commander; but Daun was by no means inferior to him as a
general. The only important achievement of Fabius is the recovering of
Tarentum; yet, after all, what was it? What is certainly true, is his
opposition to Scipio. All the speeches of Hanno and others in Livy, are
perhaps rhetorical trifles from Cœlius Antipater; but this opposition
bears the impress of history. One sees distinctly that he was of an
envious mind. He could not bear the great rising star; he would rather
have had Hannibal unconquered, than that Scipio should gain a glory
which outvied his own. He did not rejoice at the freshness of the new
generation; he wished Hannibal to be worn out by the power of time
alone.
The fourth character of this war is M. Claudius Marcellus, a dashing,
able general, the opposite to Fabius in his daring, distinguished as a
commander, and at the same time a brave soldier.
We also divide this war into periods. To the introduction belongs
all that happened previously in Spain from the taking of Saguntum
to the march over the Alps 534. The first period of the war itself
contains the first three years, and a part of 537, during which was
the irresistible progress of Hannibal. The second extends from 537
to the taking of Capua 541, when his star was already on the wane,
while the Romans once more gained ground, and their prospects became
brighter. The third is from 541 to 545, when Hannibal set his hopes on
Spain, and on being reinforced by his brother Hasdrubal. He maintains
himself in Apulia, Bruttium, and Lucania, until Hasdrubal’s defeat on
the Metaurus. The fourth period is from 545 to 550, when Hannibal was
obliged to evacuate Italy. The last, from his arrival in Africa to the
end of the war.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account