Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 2 (of 3)Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 2 (of 3)
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Rome -- History
remarks very justly, that the Romans kept silent at the progress of
the Carthaginians, because they were greatly afraid of offending them
now that the Gauls had stirred. Had Hamilcar been alive, he would
perhaps have taken a share in that war. It is strange that once during
this period a Carthaginian fleet makes its appearance off the coast of
Etruria.
Hannibal carried on the war in Spain only as a preparatory one: his
real object was the war in Italy, which he now tried to kindle. The
Carthaginians stood in the same position to him, as the Romans did
to Cæsar; commanding as he did an army entirely devoted to him, in a
country subjected by him, he was not to be controlled by the senate.
Carthage, according to the natural march of development in republics,
was then already on the decline: the chief power had passed from the
senate to the popular assembly. Now, although the people might have
idolized Hannibal, yet the senate was hardly friendly towards him; and
notwithstanding the general hatred against the Romans, the majority at
that time were not perhaps of opinion, that a war would bring relief,
and they could not see in what way Rome was to be attacked. The higher
classes were also afraid of Hannibal at the head of a victorious army.
The siege of Saguntum is placed by Livy in the year 534; yet he sees
himself that it took place in 533. Polybius blames Hannibal for having
tried to kindle the war by all kinds of artifices, and for this he
has been reproached with having been too much the partisan of the
Romans; but even as he is to be acquitted of this charge, so must
Hannibal of his. Polybius would have had him at once demand Sardinia;
but that he could not do. Had Hannibal been a king, he would perhaps
have done it; but as it was, he was obliged to draw the Carthaginians
into the war by degrees, whether they liked it or not. With this view,
he intrigued in Saguntum, and got up a quarrel between the Saguntines
and the Turdetanians, (but very likely we ought to read, instead of
Turdetanians, _Edetanians_, who were inhabitants of Valencia, as
the former lived too far off). Saguntum may not have been a purely
Iberian town: it is said that colonists from Ardea had settled there,
in which case it would be Tyrrhenian; and this is not unlikely,
although afterwards perhaps the Iberian population outnumbered them.
The derivation from Zacynthus has probably originated only from its
name. Some years before, there had been troubles there; (several of
these Spanish towns were republics; one must not fancy that their
inhabitants were barbarians like the Celts;) and the Romans had
come forward as mediators, and the victorious party had wreaked its
vengeance upon the conquered. Hannibal took advantage of this, and
stirred up the latter: at the same time, he complained at Carthage that
the Saguntines, relying upon Rome, had been guilty of acts of violence
against Carthaginian subjects. This is certainly craftiness; but he
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account