Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 3 (of 3)Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 3 (of 3)
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Rome -- History
Mucianus in Syria belonged to one of the highest Roman families, the
Licinii, and he was also descended from the Mucii: yet he knew that high
birth had lost its influence; besides which, he was effeminate, and had
tact enough to feel that he was inferior to Vespasian: they were very
different men. After having formerly been on bad terms, Mucianus now
held out his hand to the stern, harsh Vespasian. Mucianus, without being
bad, had caught the vices of his set; he had little ambition, and deemed
it wiser to be under an emperor of his own choice. Vespasian, on the
other hand, was free from the faults of the great world, having rather
the virtues which are peculiar to the lower classes: he had acknowledged
Galba; but after his death he began to think of taking the throne for
himself, being conscious that he was fit for it. Yet there was no need
for him to decide in the matter himself, as Antonius Primus, with the
Mœsian legions, encountered and defeated the army of the generals of
Vitellius near Cremona. In Rome, the insurrection had likewise already
broken out. Here Vespasian’s brother, T. Flavius Sabinus, was præfect;
and his younger son, Domitian, was kept as a sort of hostage. Against
these Vitellius was at first irritated; then he was frightened, and
wished to capitulate; after the battle of Cremona especially, he was
quite mild: but when afterwards different symptoms showed themselves, he
again veered round and wanted to arrest them. They fled to the Capitol,
which, however, was taken, and for the second time since Sylla, burned
to ashes: Domitian had a very narrow escape. At Rome, the anarchy was
complete. When in those days a man wanted to descend from his throne, he
was not able to save his life; for there were no convents then, as in
the Byzantine period. Vespasian’s party had been gradually forming; and
it gained strength owing to the successes of the victorious army, which
straightway marched to Rome, where the maddest excesses were now
committed on both sides. The conquerors took possession of the city
without meeting with any resistance, and Vitellius was murdered.
T. FLAVIUS VESPASIANUS. TITUS. DOMITIANUS.
Under these circumstances, Domitian, a very young man hardly twenty,
seized upon the government in the absence of his father: his elder
brother Titus remained in Judæa, and it was a long time before Vespasian
came to Rome. Many ruthless deeds were done in the meanwhile, rather
from personal vengeance than party motives. Although Vespasian himself
had many good qualities indeed, his party was no better than the
opposite one; just as it was in the latter part of the thirty years’
war, when the Swedish, French, and Imperial armies were equally lawless
and destructive. The dismal history of these little men is wonderfully
told by a great one, who, however, makes none of them his hero.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account