Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 3 (of 3)Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 3 (of 3)
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Rome -- History
From the time of this campaign, Domitian’s cruelty displayed itself more
and more. Before this, some individuals had already been put to death
either on suspicion, or because he hated them; an insurrection also had
broken out under L. Antonius Saturninus in _Germania Superior_, that is
to say, Alsace and Suabia, as far as the _limites_: these districts were
covered with Roman troops, and Saturninus had himself proclaimed emperor
by them, but was conquered by L. Appius Maximus, and paid for it with
his life. Domitian’s cruelty was within the bounds of human nature,
being different from that of Caligula and Nero. Caligula was mad, and
Nero very nearly so; they were downright brutes, and their cruelty, to
use an expression of Aristotle’s, was παρὰ φύσιν: to characters like
these, the rules of morality do not apply; they are degenerate specimens
of humanity. Domitian’s cruelty was that of a thoroughly bad man; it
sprang from human passions, from envy, malice, and the mere love of
mischief: avarice there was none in it, as this is rather an eastern
vice. In the senate, at that time, there were men who were worthy of
being the friends of Agricola and Tacitus: Herennius Senecio had written
the life of Helvidius Priscus; Arulenus Rusticus, that of Pætus Thrasea;
and their writings displayed much warmth of heart. Maternus and others
were likewise authors, though perhaps not altogether free from
declamation; but literature had now again some reality in it, and it was
that very reality which gave offence to the tyrant. Then arose the
horrible class of the informers, the description of which is one of the
most interesting things in Pliny’s letters: they were a very different
set from the _delatores_ of Tiberius’ reign. These men are justly
abhorred in a moral point of view; but they were men of intellect, and
some of them of no common talent. The great mass was in the days of
Tiberius much worse than it was now; and so it was, of course, with the
victims: for though the women, as we learn from Juvenal, were still
thoroughly depraved, the men, owing to the length of their training in
the school of hardship, had become better and more energetic. Domitian
was even present at the _delationes_: the informers were ingenious,
well-bred persons, who lived in good society, and also turned their
talents against equally distinguished, but noble-minded people. The time
was awful; it passed, as Tacitus says, in silent dread: the impression
which it made on a great mind, is incomparably described in the
introduction of the Agricola and in the _Historiæ_.
Particularly fearful were the three last years of Domitian. Had his rage
been only directed against the better men, he might have lived longer;
but he also turned it against the bad and fierce ones, against Prætorian
officers and his own wife Domitia, who had offended him, and whom he had
offended. Then was the conspiracy formed against him, and he was stabbed
by the officers of his guards.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account