Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 3 (of 3)Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 3 (of 3)
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Rome -- History
Like Commodus, Caracalla had a taste for gladiatorial arts; but he was
small in size, and not so handsome as Commodus. He had a silly kind of
fondness for Alexander the Great; and if we may judge from the busts, it
must be acknowledged that there was some likeness between them: the
province of Macedon was, therefore, the only one to which he did any
good. He formed a phalanx of Macedonians, and also assumed the name of
Magnus: in the law books, he is often spoken of as Magnus Antoninus. Led
by this feeling, he also went like Alexander to the East, to overthrow
the Parthian empire; and he had his Macedonian phalanx with him.
Everywhere he showed a very strong leaning towards anything that was
Greek, a taste which may have been very much owing to the fact of his
having a Syrian mother. The war against the Parthians he brought on,
without having real cause for it. According to Herodian, he was guilty
of an act of monstrous treachery: he invited Artabanus to a conference,
and then tried to surprise him, and murdered a number of Parthians.
These accounts, however, are all of them very doubtful in their details.
Severus had already taken possession of Osroëne, where the reigning
dynasty had been established for three hundred years: in the legend, an
Abgarus betakes himself to our Saviour, beseeching him for his aid in a
sickness. The king Abgarus at this time, was a vassal of the Parthians:
Caracalla expelled him, and converted Osroëne into a Roman province.
Whilst he was engaged here in preparations for a war against the
Parthians themselves, he was murdered, in the year 217, at the
instigation of the _præfectus prætorio_ M. Macrinus, who had found his
own life to be threatened. The soldiers, however, heard of the death of
their emperor with indignation, and Macrinus had to try every means to
deceive them as to his share in it; whereupon he was proclaimed emperor.
Dio’s and Herodian’s accounts of Macrinus, which are in his favour, may
be much better relied upon than the nonsense of the _Scriptores Historiæ
Augustæ_. Yet if Macrinus wished to be a praiseworthy prince, his
character as such depended upon his getting the mastery over his
soldiers: for their lawlessness had frightfully increased under
Caracalla, as he let them do what they listed without punishing them.
Macrinus, therefore, began to reform them, introducing discipline, and
trying by degrees to lessen the concessions of Caracalla; and thus he
either disbanded whole legions as veterans, and enlisted new ones on
fairer conditions, or, which seems to me more likely, he merely filled
up the old ones by new recruits. By this, however, he made himself
hateful to them. They would not put up with it; and hence arose a
rebellion. Hereupon young Avitus came forth. They might, however, have
found another leader, Maximin perhaps, if Avitus had not presented
himself.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account