Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 3 (of 3)Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 3 (of 3)
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Rome -- History
Marcus had driven back the German nations; in the reign of Commodus,
peace had been made with them; and in that of Severus, we also find
nothing about German wars; the Romans seem to have been in possession of
the _limes_ (the palisadoed ditch). But now the Germans began to
advance; and I am inclined to believe that the pale was broken through
in the time of Alexander Severus, as at the close of the war against
them, its seat was on the Rhine, and they must therefore have forced the
outworks. Unfortunately, we know next to nothing of the geography of
those parts: in many places in Swabia, we meet with remains of Roman
fortresses, the names of which are quite unknown to us. But even before
this, a great revolution had called away the emperor to the East. This
was the downfall of the Parthian dynasty, one of the unluckiest things
that could have happened to the Roman empire. The catastrophe is easily
accounted for. When a nation of shepherds gets the rule over a
cultivated region, as was often the case in Asia, it gradually loses its
bravery and sinks down to the level of those whom it has enslaved; yet
its sway will still last for some time. Parthia was a feudal kingdom, of
which Media, Babylonia, and other countries were fiefs with dynasties of
their own. In former times, the Parthians were very unequal enemies to
the Romans; but since the days of Marcus and Septimius Severus, their
power was broken: probably the conquest of Ctesiphon in the year 198,
had shaken the empire so much that its subjects thought of freeing
themselves from its yoke. Our chief guide here is the most authentic
history of Agathias. The Parthians must have utterly lost their
nationality: their light cavalry, for instance, is but very seldom
spoken off in their later times. We generally deem the insurrection of
the Persians against the Parthians to have been like that of the
Persians under Cyrus; but there was the same difference between the
Parthians and the other races, as there is at present between nomads and
the inhabitants of towns. The Persians who now shake off the yoke of the
Parthians, must therefore have been chiefly the Tadjicks (inhabitants of
towns) of the Iran race, whose abodes began at the Oxus. In Cyrus’
times, the Medes and Persians were two essentially distinct nations; but
the Medes must since then have become quite Persians, as they had now
one and the same language: Irak Ajemi has in all likelihood still
preserved the language of the Medes. A research as to this matter, would
be exceedingly interesting. In the struggle, the particulars of which
are altogether unknown to us, the Persians succeeded in shaking off the
thraldom of the Parthians; and these last vanish away, and we know not
what has become of them. On this, the Persian empire came forth anew,
and the old institutions were many of them restored: the Parthians had
ruled like barbarians over a civilized nation, oppressing it, checking
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account