Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 3 (of 3)Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 3 (of 3)
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Rome -- History
Decius is looked upon as a hero by the _Scriptores Historiæ Augustæ_ and
by Zosimus, a zealous partisan of paganism; but he is just as much hated
by the writers of ecclesiastical history for his cruelty to the
Christians, against whom indeed he was the first, after a long pause, to
set on foot a fierce persecution. The motive for it, in all likelihood,
was a sort of antagonism to the tendencies of his predecessor. What
Dodwell has asserted is strictly true, that the accounts of the numbers
of the victims are exaggerated; but the persecution of Decius was in
right earnest, and it interrupted the peace which, with the exception of
some little casualties, the Christian Church had long enjoyed. The Roman
see remained vacant for a year and a half; and Decius is represented to
have said, that he would rather allow an emperor to be chosen by his
side than a bishop. This shows how much the Christians had already
increased. Their number was great among the middle classes at Rome,
Carthage, Alexandria, and above all, at Antioch: in the East, they were
scattered; in the West, there were hardly any in the country, but they
were in the towns, especially in the large cities. The greater part of
Gaul knew nothing of this religion, except at Arles, Marseilles, and
some other chief towns: the acts of the martyrs of Lyons are quite
authentic. Just as little as in Gaul, does Christianity seem to have
spread in Spain; in Africa, there was at an early period a numerous and
zealous church; in Greece proper, there were few Christians; in the
Ionian towns, on the other hand, there were many.
STATE OF THINGS AT HOME. FINE ARTS. LITERATURE.
I make a pause in the middle of the third century, to give a general
view of some leading points. There is now a circumstance which begins
from this time to be strikingly seen. Most of the sepulchral
inscriptions which we have, are from the end of the first to the middle
of the third century; and of these the great majority are to the memory
of freedmen, there being about ten _libertini_ to one _ingenuus_. The
fine marble tombs of the great families were most of them destroyed
during the middle ages, and they are now very scarce: the stones were
used for building at the time of the restoration of the city. As the
names of free men were everywhere getting confused from the beginning of
the third century, there is indeed hardly a tomb, after the first half
of the third century, in which _libertini_ are to be met with. The
importation of slaves must have stopped, and therefore the custom of
having households of them must have immensely fallen off: the
development of the system of colonies must have absorbed the greater
part of them.
Moreover, at this time, the difference between imperial and senatorial
provinces is done away with. Severus is said to have taken the provinces
from the senate, thereby paving the way for the arrangements made by
Diocletian and Constantine.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account