Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 3 (of 3)Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 3 (of 3)
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Rome -- History
Julian was a man of uncommon talent: one has only to read his writings
to see this. He was truly Attic; since Dio Chrysostom, Greece has not
had such an elegant Attic writer: he is far superior to Libanius. That
he was a distinguished general, a humane and paternal ruler in Gaul,
is beyond all doubt: he was also great in delaying to march against
Constantius, that in the meanwhile he might still fight against the
barbarians, so as to hinder them from breaking out. The purity of his
morals was spotless; his passions were completely under control: his
only happiness was to live entirely in thought. Yet, leaving aside the
truth of the Christian religion, we cannot but acknowledge that the
attempt to revive Paganism was a downright absurdity. Heathenism, as a
real popular faith, had long since been dead; its place had been taken
by Neo-Platonism, the groundwork of which indeed was Monotheism, and
which was ingeniously tricked out with a good deal of eastern
demonology and theology, with theurgy and thaumaturgy. All the old
legends of the gods had been allegorized: people saw in Homer and the
other old writers everything but what the Greeks had seen in them. Had
the religion still lived in tradition, it would have still been able
to make a struggle, now it was impossible. This artificial,
new-fangled system, which itself was partly borrowed from
Christianity, was at most suited for one or two Metaphysicians.
Besides Julian and his counsellors and court-philosophers, such a
creed could not have numbered five hundred or a thousand followers:
moreover there was in the provinces a crowd of negative partisans, who
only cared to oppose Christianity. It was, therefore, in fact a
counter-revolutionary undertaking: he wished to introduce a hierarchy
into paganism, to create quite a new heathen religion which was much
nearer Gnosticism than that of the Hellenes, to which indeed it was
diametrically opposed. As it was impossible for him to carry this
through, he was driven to use tyranny and craft; and yet he could not
succeed after all. Christianity was certainly far from being the faith
of the majority as yet; but it had firmly taken root.
The lines of Prudentius[66] on Julian are the best thing which has been
said of him, doing the greatest honour, both to him who made them, and
to him on whom they were made:—
——_Ductor fortissimus armis,
Conditor et legum celeberrimus, ore manuque
Consultor patriæ;——
Perfidus ille Deo, sed non et perfidus orbi._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account