Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 3 (of 3)Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 3 (of 3)
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Rome -- History
The conspirators were so far from having formed a deliberate plan, that
they were not even agreed as to what was to be done next. In the first
moment, Cassius demanded that Antony should die; but Brutus was against
it, declaring that it was enough that one man should have died. In this
Brutus was evidently wrong, as many besides ought to have been slain, to
set everything right: at all events, Antony should have been killed, if
even a shadow of the republic was still to be kept up; for indeed it was
he, and men like him, who had made Cæsar’s rule hateful. He had been his
chief instigator to take the diadem, and it is generally acknowledged
that, if left to himself, Cæsar would have done nothing but good. In the
height of the tumult, most of the senators took to flight, a few openly
declared for Brutus and his companions, as tyrannicides. Cicero was one
of these, which shows no small courage on his part. On neither side were
people at all aware of what was next to follow. One might have believed
that the people would have been full of exultation after Cæsar’s murder,
as public opinion was against him, ever since he had aspired to the
diadem; yet there is nothing more changeable than man: now that the
thing which they had wanted was done, the same people who a few days
before had wished for Cæsar’s death, were bewailing and lamenting him.
The tumult lasted for some days. Cæsar had been murdered on the
fifteenth of March; on the seventeenth, the senate met to deliberate on
the steps which were to be taken in a time of such great excitement. In
this meeting, Antony behaved quite differently from what had been
expected, holding out his hand for a reconciliation: people indeed did
not trust him; yet they believed that he was forced by circumstances to
act in this way. Cicero came forward as an adviser, and it was decreed
that an amnesty should be granted for all that was past; just as they
did at Athens after the time of the thirty tyrants. There was much
consultation about what was to be done. Brutus and Cassius, as public
opinion was against them, had betaken themselves to the Capitol to
escape from the storm; and from thence they began to negotiate: there
were many of Cæsar’s soldiers in the city, others thronged in, and the
commotion was very great. The resolutions which were come to, aimed at
reconciliation; but they were full of contradictions to each other.
Whilst, on the one hand, there was a strong feeling of admiration for
the murderers, the decrees of the senate took quite the opposite turn.
The proposal that Cæsar should be declared a tyrant, and all his acts be
repealed, was not only rejected by the senate, through fear of the
veterans, but divine honours were even conferred upon him, and the
validity of all his ordinances expressly acknowledged. The motion had
been made that his will should be annulled; but his father-in-law, L.
Calpurnius Piso, with persevering impudence, carried that it should be
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account