Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 3 (of 3)Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 3 (of 3)
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Rome -- History
passed over the Hellespont into Macedon. Near Philippi, in the
neighbourhood of the gold mine of Pangæus, there is between the
mountains and the sea, where the road leads from Amphipolis to Thrace, a
narrow defile which the triumvirs had occupied. Brutus was guided by a
faithful Thracian ally, and so he turned the pass, and encamped over
against the enemy near Philippi: the fleet was in the western seas.
Before he started for this march, Brutus, either at Sardis or at Abydus,
saw the vision which called itself his evil genius, and announced that
it would meet him again at Philippi. The question now was, what was to
be done. Cassius, an experienced general, rather shrank from bringing
matters to a quick decision; but the general voice of the army called
for the attack. The troops stood faithful to their generals, and no
desertion took place: it would therefore have been possible to protract
the war. Had Brutus and Cassius caused themselves to be joined by their
fleet, which they did not know that they could do, and then acted for a
considerable time on the defensive, Octavian and Antony would very
likely have been forced for want of provisions to retreat; but unhappily
they determined upon giving battle. In the army of Brutus and Cassius
were the Romans of the highest rank; the greater part of these had been
proscribed. Most of those who had saved their lives were now with them;
only a few were with Sextus Pompey in Sicily, who had a large fleet of
pirate ships, with which, however, Brutus and Cassius, as men of honour,
and, even for the simple reason that they would thus have made
themselves hateful to the people, would not unite themselves. The battle
was fought; Brutus leading the left, Cassius the right wing (or rather,
according to the ancient way of speaking, the left and right _horns_;
for the term wing supposes a centre, whereas there were two separate
armies, which were drawn up close together). In the battle, the _fatum_
again showed its influence. Brutus overcame the enemy with great ease;
and the one who distinguished himself most under him, was M. Valerius
Messalla, a very young man, whom Cicero much loved, and whom he had
recommended to him. In the reign of Augustus also, Messalla afterwards
bore a high character. Brutus opposed Octavian; Cassius, Antony.
Octavian is generally accused—Antony taxed him with it in his letters,
and in public—of not having taken the least share in the battle; his
army was utterly defeated. The excuses which are pleaded for him are
very sorry ones; but as the command had devolved upon Agrippa, it
certainly had not fallen into worse hands. In the Julian centre, a stout
resistance was made; the right wing, however, was undeniably beaten, and
the camp of Octavian taken. That of Cassius was not forced; but his
troops were routed before it. Owing to the centre standing its ground,
it was not possible to see the success of the army on the left wing; so
that Cassius was led to think that all was lost.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account