Nineteen Centuries of Drink in England: A HistoryFrench, Richard Valpy
History
Nineteen Centuries of Drink in England: A History
French, Richard Valpy
Drinking customs -- England; Drinking of alcoholic beverages -- Great Britain; England -- Social life and customs
In 1603 the power of licensing inns and ale-houses was granted by
letters patent to certain persons, in which it was enacted that no
victualler could sell less than one full quart of the best ale for one
penny, and two quarts of the smaller sort for the same. The preamble of
the statute of 1604 is most valuable for the information it affords as
to what the ancient Parliaments considered to be the legitimate use of
a tavern.
Whereas the ancient, true, and principal use of wine, ale-houses,
and victualling-houses was for the receipt, relief, and lodging
of wayfaring people travelling from place to place, and for the
supply of the wants of such people as are not able by greater
quantities to make their provision of victuals; and not meant for
entertainment and harbouring of lewd and idle people to spend
and consume their money and time in lewd and drunken manner: it
is enacted that only travellers, and travellers’ friends, and
labourers for one hour at dinner-time or lodgers can receive
entertainment under penalty.
The statute of 4th James imposes _punishment for drunkenness_:--
Whereas the loathsome and odious sin of drunkenness is of late
grown into common use, being the root and foundation of many
other enormous sins, as bloodshed, stabbing, murder, swearing,
fornication, adultery, and such like, to the great dishonour
of God and of our nation, the overthrow of many good arts and
manual trades, the disabling of divers workmen, and the general
impoverishing of many good subjects, abusively wasting the good
creatures of God.
Therefore a fine of five shillings was imposed for intoxication, or
confinement in the stocks for six hours, and for the first offence of
remaining drinking in a person’s own neighbourhood, a fine of three
shillings and fourpence, or the stocks, the penalty being increased for
further offence. The fine, it must be remembered, was worth several
times the same amount imposed now for intoxication, and the high road
to it, tippling, is now passed over. The time prescribed in the stocks
was fixed at six hours, because by that time the statute presumed
the offender would have regained his senses, and not be liable to do
mischief to his neighbours.[127]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account